75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21728409)
1. Distinctiveness and repetition in item recognition.
Singer M; Fazaluddin A; Andrew KN
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Sep; 65(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 21728409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recognition of categorised words: repetition effects in rote study.
Singer M; Fazaluddin A; Andrew KN
Memory; 2013; 21(4):467-81. PubMed ID: 23170839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What causes the isolation effect?
Hunt RR; Lamb CA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1359-66. PubMed ID: 11713872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: the distinctiveness heuristic.
Budson AE; Dodson CS; Vatner JM; Daffner KR; Black PM; Schacter DL
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):860-71. PubMed ID: 15716158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.
Dobbins IG; Kroll NE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1186-98. PubMed ID: 16393039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The distinctiveness effect in forenames: the role of subjective experiences and recognition memory.
Brandt KR; Gardiner JM; Macrae CN
Br J Psychol; 2006 May; 97(Pt 2):269-80. PubMed ID: 16613653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revisiting von Restorff's early isolation effect.
Schmidt SR; Schmidt CR
Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 27631791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did.
Hunt RR
Psychon Bull Rev; 1995 Mar; 2(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 24203592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a category recognition task.
Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 19210100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory.
Neely JH; Tse CS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1141-72. PubMed ID: 19048453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.
Tussing AA; Greene RL
Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 11258228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory.
Opitz B
Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 20493623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli.
Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A
Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hebb repetition effects in visual memory: the roles of verbal rehearsal and distinctiveness.
Horton N; Hay DC; Smyth MM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008; 61(12):1769-77. PubMed ID: 18609390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False item recognition in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Abe N; Fujii T; Nishio Y; Iizuka O; Kanno S; Kikuchi H; Takagi M; Hiraoka K; Yamasaki H; Choi H; Hirayama K; Shinohara M; Mori E
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1897-902. PubMed ID: 21419789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preschoolers' use of surface similarity in object comparisons: taking context into account.
Paik JH; Mix KS
J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Nov; 95(3):194-214. PubMed ID: 16904122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
Livingston KR; Andrews JK
Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
