BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21728466)

  • 1. Conflict adaptation by means of associative learning.
    Braem S; Verguts T; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1662-6. PubMed ID: 21728466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of fMRI (noise) on cognitive control.
    Hommel B; Fischer R; Colzato LS; van den Wildenberg WP; Cellini C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 22201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis.
    Iani C; Ricci F; Baroni G; Rubichi S
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):856-63. PubMed ID: 19648030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
    Wühr P; Biebl R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In the mood for adaptation: how affect regulates conflict-driven control.
    van Steenbergen H; Band GP; Hommel B
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1629-34. PubMed ID: 20943936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unmixing the mixing cost: contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression.
    Marí-Beffa P; Cooper S; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):478-88. PubMed ID: 22060145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
    Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflict adaptation depends on task structure.
    Akçay C; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):958-73. PubMed ID: 18665738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control.
    Schlaghecken F; Martini P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 21967273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Across-task priming revisited: response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Moutsopoulou K; Waszak F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 22004198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No negative priming without cognitive control.
    de Fockert JW; Mizon GA; D'Ubaldo M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1333-41. PubMed ID: 20854003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.