These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21728467)

  • 1. Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):935-51. PubMed ID: 21728467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preparing or executing the wrong task: the influence on switch effects.
    Desmet C; Fias W; Brass M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1172-84. PubMed ID: 22375558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability.
    Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching?
    Grange JA; Cross E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 25028178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.
    Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive control of response preparedness in task switching.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R; Druey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1826-35. PubMed ID: 19428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching.
    Grange JA; Kowalczyk AW; O'Loughlin R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1568-1583. PubMed ID: 28383961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: evidence from LRP and N2.
    Spapé MM; Band GP; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Sep; 88(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 21767598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?
    Becker SI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):324-39. PubMed ID: 17868628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching.
    Arrington CM; Weaver SM; Pauker RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 20565222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation.
    Hodgetts HM; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1120-32. PubMed ID: 16938050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.
    Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):484-99. PubMed ID: 20192544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the decay of distractor-response episodes.
    Frings C
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20705549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.