These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21728766)
1. Addressing the heterogeneous IT landscape of bioanalytical laboratories to increase efficiency of regulatory reporting and data analysis. Bittner N Bioanalysis; 2011 Jul; 3(13):1429-32. PubMed ID: 21728766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Historical perspective on the development and evolution of bioanalytical guidance and technology. Shah VP; Bansal S Bioanalysis; 2011 Apr; 3(8):823-7. PubMed ID: 21510754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulated bioanalytical laboratory automation: where we came from, where we are and where we are going. Shen JX Bioanalysis; 2011 Jul; 3(13):1415-8. PubMed ID: 21728764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fit-for-purpose bioanalytical cross-validation for LC-MS/MS assays in clinical studies. Xu X; Ji QC; Jemal M; Gleason C; Shen JX; Stouffer B; Arnold ME Bioanalysis; 2013 Jan; 5(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 23256474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the implementation of a well-designed electronic laboratory notebook on bioanalytical laboratory function. Zeng J; Hillman M; Arnold M Bioanalysis; 2011 Jul; 3(13):1501-11. PubMed ID: 21728774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control for the clinical chemistry laboratory. Ohman S Qual Assur; 1997; 5(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 9436236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of an automated GLP final report preparation software solution. Elvebak LE Bioanalysis; 2011 Jul; 3(13):1421-7. PubMed ID: 21728765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of new laboratory tests]. Bolann BJ; Sandberg S Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Feb; 123(3):337-9. PubMed ID: 12640904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effective and business-beneficial computer validation for bioanalytical laboratories. McDowall R Bioanalysis; 2011 Jul; 3(13):1487-99. PubMed ID: 21728773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conducting remote bioanalytical data monitoring and review based on scientific quality objectives. He L Bioanalysis; 2011 Jul; 3(13):1447-56. PubMed ID: 21728770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An indecent proposal or improved quality of bioanalytical data in clinical studies. Svensson L Bioanalysis; 2012 Jan; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22191587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sample to sample carryover: a source of analytical laboratory error and its relevance to integrated clinical chemistry/immunoassay systems. Armbruster DA; Alexander DB Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Nov; 373(1-2):37-43. PubMed ID: 16777083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A note on the use of outlier criteria in Ontario laboratory quality control schemes. Hayes K; Kinsella A; Coffey N Clin Biochem; 2007 Feb; 40(3-4):147-52. PubMed ID: 17222814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpretation of internal quality control: time for a re-think? Deacon AC Ann Clin Biochem; 2009 Nov; 46(Pt 6):534-5. PubMed ID: 19808742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Automating bioanalytical sample analysis through enhanced system integration. Patel V; Leach D; Hornberger M; Williams K; Shih J; Ma M; Laycock J Bioanalysis; 2013 Jul; 5(13):1649-59. PubMed ID: 23822128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]