300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21728785)
1. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces.
Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Vazquez L; Park YJ; Sammartino G; Bernard JP
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 37(5):525-42. PubMed ID: 21728785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of titanium implant surface nanoroughness and calcium phosphate low impregnation on bone cell activity in vitro.
Bucci-Sabattini V; Cassinelli C; Coelho PG; Minnici A; Trani A; Dohan Ehrenfest DM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 20031453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. XPS, AES and SEM analysis of recent dental implants.
Kang BS; Sul YT; Oh SJ; Lee HJ; Albrektsson T
Acta Biomater; 2009 Jul; 5(6):2222-9. PubMed ID: 19261554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness.
Sul YT; Byon E; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 18807558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M
J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface Modifications of Commercial Dental Implant Systems: An Overview.
Sivaswamy V; Bahl V
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2023; 33(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 36734929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface characterization of three titanium dental implants.
Fandridis J; Papadopoulos T
Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18332762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone-implant contact at calcium phosphate-coated and porous titanium oxide (TiUnite)-modified oral implants.
Xiropaidis AV; Qahash M; Lim WH; Shanaman RH; Rohrer MD; Wikesjö UM; Hall J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 16164458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between bioactive fluoride modified and bioinert anodically oxidized implant surfaces in early bone response using rabbit tibia model.
Choi JY; Lee HJ; Jang JU; Yeo IS
Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22382750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface characterization of titanium-based implant materials.
Placko HE; Mishra S; Weimer JJ; Lucas LC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 10874800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12608667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of failed commercially pure titanium dental implants: a scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectrometer x-ray study.
Shibli JA; Marcantonio E; d'Avila S; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1092-9. PubMed ID: 16018751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits.
Poulos NM; Rodriguez NA; Lee J; Rueggeberg FA; Schüpbach P; Hall J; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 21841981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wetting behavior of dental implants.
Rupp F; Scheideler L; Eichler M; Geis-Gerstorfer J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1256-66. PubMed ID: 22167431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
