These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21729064)

  • 1. Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation.
    Arnqvist G
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2111-6. PubMed ID: 21729064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.
    Foerster K; Coulson T; Sheldon BC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH; Kruuk LE
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1107-10. PubMed ID: 17597758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
    de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fitness variation due to sexual antagonism and linkage disequilibrium.
    Patten MM; Haig D; Ubeda F
    Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3638-42. PubMed ID: 20722728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual antagonism for testosterone maintains multiple mating behaviour.
    Mokkonen M; Koskela E; Mappes T; Mills SC
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):277-83. PubMed ID: 21950272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assortative mate choice and dominance modification: alternative ways of removing heterozygote disadvantage.
    Durinx M; Van Dooren TJ
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):334-52. PubMed ID: 19054051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus.
    Mokkonen M; Kokko H; Koskela E; Lehtonen J; Mappes T; Martiskainen H; Mills SC
    Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6058):972-4. PubMed ID: 22096197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assortative mating for fitness and the evolution of recombination.
    Blachford A; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 16929651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assortative mating counteracts the evolution of dispersal polymorphisms.
    Fronhofer EA; Kubisch A; Hovestadt T; Poethke HJ
    Evolution; 2011 Sep; 65(9):2461-9. PubMed ID: 21884049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection.
    Connallon T; Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1671-82. PubMed ID: 20050912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protected polymorphism and evolutionary stability in pleiotropic models with trait-specific dominance.
    Van Dooren TJ
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 17133856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly?
    Schneider KA; Bürger R
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):570-88. PubMed ID: 16599933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genic capture, sex linkage, and the heritability of fitness.
    Connallon T
    Am Nat; 2010 May; 175(5):564-76. PubMed ID: 20331359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Replicator-dynamics models of sexual conflict.
    Kimura M; Ihara Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19505480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.
    Grieshop K; Arnqvist G
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(12):e2006810. PubMed ID: 30533008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus.
    Patten MM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2360-70. PubMed ID: 25293344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness.
    Zajitschek F; Connallon T
    Evolution; 2018 Jun; 72(6):1306-1316. PubMed ID: 29667189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.