BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21729102)

  • 1. Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: an ERP study.
    Li P; Han C; Lei Y; Holroyd CB; Li H
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 21729102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.
    Li P; Jia S; Feng T; Liu Q; Suo T; Li H
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1727-33. PubMed ID: 20452440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feedback-related potentials are sensitive to sequential order of decision outcomes in a gambling task.
    Osinsky R; Mussel P; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Dec; 49(12):1579-89. PubMed ID: 23066877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack.
    Hewig J; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 18761133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anxiety and feedback negativity.
    Gu R; Huang YX; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):961-7. PubMed ID: 20374540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
    Leng Y; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feedback related brain activity in a gambling task: a temporal analysis of EEG correlates.
    Lucchiari C; Pravettoni G
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Dec; 51(6):449-54. PubMed ID: 20704690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When people matter more than money: an ERPs study.
    Rigoni D; Polezzi D; Rumiati R; Guarino R; Sartori G
    Brain Res Bull; 2010 Mar; 81(4-5):445-52. PubMed ID: 20006683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERP correlates of complex human decision making in a gambling paradigm: detection and resolution of conflict.
    Mennes M; Wouters H; van den Bergh B; Lagae L; Stiers P
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 18665870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological correlates of decision-making in high-risk versus low-risk conditions of a gambling game.
    Yang J; Zhang Q
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1456-61. PubMed ID: 21913928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Schurger A; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jul; 14(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15054053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.
    Holroyd CB; Pakzad-Vaezi KL; Krigolson OE
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):688-97. PubMed ID: 18513364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. P300, not feedback error-related negativity, manifests the waiting cost of receiving reward information.
    Wang J; Chen J; Lei Y; Li P
    Neuroreport; 2014 Sep; 25(13):1044-8. PubMed ID: 25004079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of age on the neural correlates of feedback processing in a naturalistic gambling game.
    West R; Tiernan BN; Kieffaber PD; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):734-45. PubMed ID: 24758702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.
    Holroyd CB; Hajcak G; Larsen JT
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 16427615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How bad was it? Differences in the time course of sensitivity to the magnitude of loss in problem gamblers and controls.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 247():140-5. PubMed ID: 23538067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome evaluations in group decision making using the majority rule: an electrophysiological study.
    Kimura K; Katayama J
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Sep; 50(9):848-57. PubMed ID: 23758326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural basis of risky decision-making in a blackjack task.
    Yang J; Li H; Zhang Y; Qiu J; Zhang Q
    Neuroreport; 2007 Sep; 18(14):1507-10. PubMed ID: 17712284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The near-miss effect in slot-machine gambling: modulation of feedback-related negativity by subjective value.
    Luo Q; Wang Y; Qu C
    Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(18):989-93. PubMed ID: 22045258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.