370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21729812)
1. Monitoring fluid responsiveness.
Hofer CK; Cannesson M
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2011 Jun; 49(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 21729812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program.
McGee WT
J Intensive Care Med; 2009; 24(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19736180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of arterial pulse pressure variation and left ventricular stroke volume variation in estimating cardiac pre-load during open heart surgery.
Rex S; Schälte G; Schroth S; de Waal EE; Metzelder S; Overbeck Y; Rossaint R; Buhre W
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Oct; 51(9):1258-67. PubMed ID: 17714575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional hemodynamic parameters do not reflect volume responsiveness in the immediate phase after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.
Kronas N; Kubitz JC; Forkl S; Kemming GI; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):780-3. PubMed ID: 21115364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock.
Michard F; Lopes MR; Auler JO
Crit Care; 2007; 11(3):131. PubMed ID: 17521454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.
Cecconi M; Monti G; Hamilton MA; Puntis M; Dawson D; Tuccillo ML; Della Rocca G; Grounds RM; Rhodes A
Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 May; 78(5):527-33. PubMed ID: 22534733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness.
Cavallaro F; Sandroni C; Antonelli M
Minerva Anestesiol; 2008 Apr; 74(4):123-35. PubMed ID: 18212731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Hedderich J; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1170-7. PubMed ID: 19076570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using arterial pressure waveform analysis for the assessment of fluid responsiveness.
Cannesson M; de Backer D; Hofer CK
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2011 Sep; 8(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 22026628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness.
Sakka SG; Becher L; Kozieras J; van Hout N
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 26(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 19401662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of right ventricular insufficiency and guidance of volume therapy are facilitated by simultaneous monitoring of static and functional preload parameters.
Richter HP; Petersen C; Goetz AE; Reuter DA; Kubitz JC
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1051-5. PubMed ID: 21924635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Invasive measures of left ventricular preload.
Monnet X; Teboul JL
Curr Opin Crit Care; 2006 Jun; 12(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 16672783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
