These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Temporal changes in the use of drug-eluting stents for patients with non-ST-Segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from 2006 to 2008: results from the can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients supress ADverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) and acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network-get with the guidelines (ACTION-GWTG) registries. Roe MT; Chen AY; Cannon CP; Rao S; Rumsfeld J; Magid DJ; Brindis R; Klein LW; Gibler WB; Ohman EM; Peterson ED; Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2009 Sep; 2(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 20031871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease in US Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals From 2013 to 2015. Hess PL; Kini V; Liu W; Roldan P; Autruong P; Grunwald GK; O'Donnell C; Doll JA; Ho PM; Bradley SM JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e203144. PubMed ID: 32315067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Utilization and Appropriateness across the United States. Thomas MP; Parzynski CS; Curtis JP; Seth M; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Patel MR; Bradley SM; Gurm HS PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138251. PubMed ID: 26379053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-World Use and Appropriateness of Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusion (from a Japanese Multicenter Registry). Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Numasawa Y; Suzuki M; Noma S; Nishi Y; Fukuda K Am J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 116(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 26183792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient access and 1-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention facilities with and without on-site cardiothoracic surgery: insights from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) program. Maddox TM; Stanislawski MA; O'Donnell C; Plomondon ME; Bradley SM; Ho PM; Tsai TT; Shroff AR; Speiser B; Jesse RJ; Rumsfeld JS Circulation; 2014 Oct; 130(16):1383-91. PubMed ID: 25189215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriateness ratings of percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and its association with the trend of noninvasive testing. Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Miyata H; Ueda I; Ishikawa S; Ohki T; Nishi Y; Hayashida K; Maekawa Y; Kawamura A; Higashi T; Fukuda K JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 7(9):1000-9. PubMed ID: 25234672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indications for percutaneous coronary interventions performed in US hospitals: a report from the NCDR®. Cram P; House JA; Messenger JC; Piana RN; Horwitz PA; Spertus JA Am Heart J; 2012 Feb; 163(2):214-21.e1. PubMed ID: 22305839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital-level percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Bradley SM; Spertus JA; Kennedy KF; Nallamothu BK; Chan PS; Patel MR; Bryson CL; Malenka DJ; Rumsfeld JS JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1630-9. PubMed ID: 25156821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional and hospital variations in the extent of decline in the proportion of percutaneous coronary interventions performed for nonacute indications - a nationwide population-based study. Liang FW; Lu TH; Wu HM; Lee JC; Yin WH BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jun; 17(1):149. PubMed ID: 28599642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness: Insights From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program. Bradley SM; Bohn CM; Malenka DJ; Graham MM; Bryson CL; McCabe JM; Curtis JP; Lambert-Kerzner A; Maynard C Circulation; 2015 Jul; 132(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 26022910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of outcomes of patients ≥ 80 years of age having percutaneous coronary intervention according to presentation (stable vs unstable angina pectoris/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). Antonsen L; Jensen LO; Thayssen P; Christiansen EH; Junker A; Tilsted HH; Terkelsen CJ; Kaltoft A; Maeng M; Hansen KN; Ravkilde J; Lassen JF; Madsen M; Sørensen HT; Thuesen L Am J Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 108(10):1395-400. PubMed ID: 21890087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Fox KA; Goodman SG; Klein W; Brieger D; Steg PG; Dabbous O; Avezum A Eur Heart J; 2002 Aug; 23(15):1177-89. PubMed ID: 12127920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early angioplasty in acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation improves outcome but increases the need for six-month repeat revascularization: an analysis of the PURSUIT Trial. Platelet glycoprotein IIB/IIIA in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy. Ronner E; Boersma E; Laarman GJ; Somsen GA; Harrington RA; Deckers JW; Topol EJ; Califf RM; Simoons ML J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jun; 39(12):1924-9. PubMed ID: 12084589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]