232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21730858)
1. Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21730858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Hu H; Dietz M
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Kirby B; Brown C; Abbas P; Etler C; O'Brien S
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.
Sammeth CA; Brown AD; Greene NT; Tollin DJ
Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108839. PubMed ID: 37429100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.
Smith ZM; Delgutte B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):134-51. PubMed ID: 17225976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.
Haywood NR; Undurraga JA; Marquardt T; McAlpine D
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing current levels in children with bilateral cochlear implants using electrophysiological and behavioral measures.
Gordon KA; Abbasalipour P; Papsin BC
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():193-206. PubMed ID: 27021590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.
Brown AD; Anbuhl KL; Gilmer JI; Tollin DJ
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 31314646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.
Sammeth CA; Greene NT; Brown AD; Tollin DJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):629-643. PubMed ID: 33141776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
