231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21730858)
21. Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.
Sammeth CA; Greene NT; Brown AD; Tollin DJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):629-643. PubMed ID: 33141776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Jensen KK; Cosentino S; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521997324. PubMed ID: 34057382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Relationship Between Interaural Insertion-Depth Differences, Scalar Location, and Interaural Time-Difference Processing in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Cleary M; Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble J; Kolberg E; Jensen KK; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Goupell MJ
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221129165. PubMed ID: 36379607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Riggs WJ; Carter BL; Xie R
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1228-1244. PubMed ID: 34999595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus psychoacoustical measures.
Zhou J; Durrant JD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1508-15. PubMed ID: 14514204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evidence for separate processing in the human brainstem of interaural intensity and temporal disparities for sound lateralization.
Pratt H; Polyakov A; Kontorovich L
Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 9213116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():363-71. PubMed ID: 23716242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
He S; McFayden TC; Shahsavarani BS; Teagle HFB; Ewend M; Henderson L; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):482-494. PubMed ID: 28968281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Temporal integration of short-duration pulse trains in cochlear implant listeners: Psychophysical and electrophysiological measurements.
Macherey O; Stahl P; Intartaglia B; Meunier S; Roman S; Schön D
Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108176. PubMed ID: 33524792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing Methods for Pairing Electrodes Across Ears With Cochlear Implants.
Staisloff HE; Aronoff JM
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1218-1227. PubMed ID: 33538427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Ehlers E; Goupell MJ; Zheng Y; Godar SP; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4264. PubMed ID: 28618809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combined neural and behavioural measures of temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2885-905. PubMed ID: 26627764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dual electrode stimulation using the nucleus CI24RE cochlear implant: electrode impedance and pitch ranking studies.
Busby PA; Plant KL
Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16230899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
