230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21730858)
41. Abnormal binaural spectral integration in cochlear implant users.
Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Wozny DR
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 24464088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Aging effects on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in the Mongolian gerbil: Effects of interaural time and level differences.
Laumen G; Tollin DJ; Beutelmann R; Klump GM
Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():46-58. PubMed ID: 27173973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL
Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1472-1486. PubMed ID: 35139051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
Bahmer A; Polak M; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e63-74. PubMed ID: 24231629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users.
Brown CJ; Etler C; He S; O'Brien S; Erenberg S; Kim JR; Dhuldhoya AN; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):704-17. PubMed ID: 18596644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Changes in electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Deniz B; Kara E; Polat Z; Deniz R; Ataş A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 141():110555. PubMed ID: 33333339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Feb; 17(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26377826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of device use after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: An electrophysiological approach.
Sparreboom M; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 86():161-6. PubMed ID: 27260600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.
Hodges AV; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Balkany TJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 7917192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Relationships Between the Auditory Nerve's Ability to Recover From Neural Adaptation, Cortical Encoding of and Perceptual Sensitivity to Within-channel Temporal Gaps in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
He S; Yuan Y; Skidmore J
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1202-1211. PubMed ID: 37018083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Across Species "Natural Ablation" Reveals the Brainstem Source of a Noninvasive Biomarker of Binaural Hearing.
Benichoux V; Ferber A; Hunt S; Hughes E; Tollin D
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(40):8563-8573. PubMed ID: 30126974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Laurello SA
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
