These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21731011)

  • 1. The MSM program: web-based statistics package for estimating usual dietary intake using the Multiple Source Method.
    Harttig U; Haubrock J; Knüppel S; Boeing H;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S87-91. PubMed ID: 21731011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing four methods to estimate usual intake distributions.
    Souverein OW; Dekkers AL; Geelen A; Haubrock J; de Vries JH; Ocké MC; Harttig U; Boeing H; van 't Veer P;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S92-101. PubMed ID: 21731012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The European Food Consumption Validation Project: conclusions and recommendations.
    de Boer EJ; Slimani N; van 't Veer P; Boeing H; Feinberg M; Leclercq C; Trolle E; Amiano P; Andersen LF; Freisling H; Geelen A; Harttig U; Huybrechts I; Kaic-Rak A; Lafay L; Lillegaard IT; Ruprich J; de Vries JH; Ocké MC;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S102-7. PubMed ID: 21731001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of statistical methods to correct food intake distribution: comparison between observed and estimated usual intake.
    Verly E; Oliveira DC; Fisberg RM; Marchioni DM
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Sep; 116(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 27523187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rationale and methods of the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) Project.
    de Boer EJ; Slimani N; van 't Veer P; Boeing H; Feinberg M; Leclercq C; Trolle E; Amiano P; Andersen LF; Freisling H; Geelen A; Harttig U; Huybrechts I; Kaic-Rak A; Lafay L; Lillegaard IT; Ruprich J; de Vries JH; Ocké MC;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S1-4. PubMed ID: 21731000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Innovative approaches to estimate individual usual dietary intake in large-scale epidemiological studies.
    Conrad J; Nöthlings U
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2017 Aug; 76(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 28162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the distribution of usual dietary intake by short-term measurements.
    Hoffmann K; Boeing H; Dufour A; Volatier JL; Telman J; Virtanen M; Becker W; De Henauw S;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2002 May; 56 Suppl 2():S53-62. PubMed ID: 12082518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing Methods from the National Cancer Institute vs Multiple Source Method for Estimating Usual Intake of Nutrients in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latino Youth.
    Pereira JL; de Castro MA; Crispim SP; Fisberg RM; Isasi CR; Mossavar-Rahmani Y; Van Horn L; Carnethon MR; Daviglus ML; Perreira KM; Gallo LC; Sotres-Alvarez D; Mattei J
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Jan; 121(1):59-73.e16. PubMed ID: 32773213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory.
    Dodd KW; Guenther PM; Freedman LS; Subar AF; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Tooze JA; Krebs-Smith SM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Oct; 106(10):1640-50. PubMed ID: 17000197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomarker-based evaluation of two 24-h recalls for comparing usual fish, fruit and vegetable intakes across European centers in the EFCOVAL Study.
    Crispim SP; Geelen A; Souverein OW; Hulshof PJ; Ruprich J; Dofkova M; Huybrechts I; De Keyzer W; Lillegaard IT; Andersen LF; Lafay L; Rousseau AS; Ocké MC; Slimani N; van 't Veer P; de Vries JH;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S38-47. PubMed ID: 21731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution.
    Tooze JA; Midthune D; Dodd KW; Freedman LS; Krebs-Smith SM; Subar AF; Guenther PM; Carroll RJ; Kipnis V
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Oct; 106(10):1575-87. PubMed ID: 17000190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating usual food intake distributions by using the multiple source method in the EPIC-Potsdam Calibration Study.
    Haubrock J; Nöthlings U; Volatier JL; Dekkers A; Ocké M; Harttig U; Illner AK; Knüppel S; Andersen LF; Boeing H;
    J Nutr; 2011 May; 141(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 21430241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of 2 × 24-h dietary recalls combined with a food-recording booklet, against a 7-day food-record method among schoolchildren.
    Trolle E; Amiano P; Ege M; Bower E; Lioret S; Brants H; Kaic-Rak A; de Boer EJ; Andersen LF;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 21731009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the MSM and NCI Method for Estimating the Usual Intake of Nutrients and Food According to Four Seasons of Seven Consecutive Daily 24 Hour Dietary Recalls in Chinese Adults.
    Huang K; Yu D; Guo Q; Yang Y; Wei X; Zhao L; Fang H
    Nutrients; 2022 Jan; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35276804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the food frequency consumption essential as covariate to estimate usual intake of episodically consumed foods?
    Verly- E; Fisberg RM; Marchioni DM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2012 Nov; 66(11):1254-8. PubMed ID: 22968101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision of usual food intake estimates according to the percentage of individuals with a second dietary measurement.
    Verly E; Castro MA; Fisberg RM; Marchioni DM
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Jul; 112(7):1015-20. PubMed ID: 22889632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies.
    Touvier M; Kesse-Guyot E; Méjean C; Pollet C; Malon A; Castetbon K; Hercberg S
    Br J Nutr; 2011 Apr; 105(7):1055-64. PubMed ID: 21080983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The standardized computerized 24-h dietary recall method EPIC-Soft adapted for pan-European dietary monitoring.
    Slimani N; Casagrande C; Nicolas G; Freisling H; Huybrechts I; Ocké MC; Niekerk EM; van Rossum C; Bellemans M; De Maeyer M; Lafay L; Krems C; Amiano P; Trolle E; Geelen A; de Vries JH; de Boer EJ;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Jul; 65 Suppl 1():S5-15. PubMed ID: 21731006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the effect of measurement error when using one or two 24 h dietary recalls to assess eating out: a study in the context of the HECTOR project.
    Orfanos P; Knüppel S; Naska A; Haubrock J; Trichopoulou A; Boeing H
    Br J Nutr; 2013 Sep; 110(6):1107-17. PubMed ID: 23433469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection of methodology to assess food intake.
    Biró G; Hulshof KF; Ovesen L; Amorim Cruz JA;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2002 May; 56 Suppl 2():S25-32. PubMed ID: 12082515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.