These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Interactions between cues to visual motion in depth. Howard IP; Fujii Y; Allison RS J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24554479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shrinking neighbors: a quantitative examination of the 'shrinking building illusion'. Fukuda H; Seno T Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 22353535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of monocular depth cues on the detection of moving objects by moving observers. Royden CS; Parsons D; Travatello J Vision Res; 2016 Jul; 124():7-14. PubMed ID: 27264029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Illusory size determines the perception of ambiguous apparent motion. Stepper MY; Moore CM; Rolke B; Hein E Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1230-1238. PubMed ID: 32779116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Depth perception from dynamic occlusion in motion parallax: roles of expansion-compression versus accretion-deletion. Yoonessi A; Baker CL J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 24130259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational modeling of depth ordering in occlusion through accretion or deletion of texture. Ruda H; Livitz G; Riesen G; Mingolla E J Vis; 2015; 15(9):20. PubMed ID: 26230982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of motion parallax to segmentation and depth perception. Yoonessi A; Baker CL J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):13. PubMed ID: 21865339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The swinging doors of perception: stereomotion without binocular matching. Brooks KR; Gillam BJ J Vis; 2006 Jun; 6(7):685-95. PubMed ID: 16895452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A depth illusion supports the model of General Object Constancy: Size and depth constancies related by a same distance-scaling factor. Qian J; Petrov Y Vision Res; 2016 Dec; 129():77-86. PubMed ID: 27810350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues. Warren PA; Rushton SK Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1406-19. PubMed ID: 19480063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amodal causal capture in the tunnel effect. Bae GY; Flombaum JI Perception; 2011; 40(1):74-90. PubMed ID: 21513186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Occlusion and the solution to visual motion ambiguity: Looking beyond the aperture problem. van der Smagt MJ; Stoner GR J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 18318630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A neural model of visual figure-ground segregation from kinetic occlusion. Barnes T; Mingolla E Neural Netw; 2013 Jan; 37():141-64. PubMed ID: 23098751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of occlusion by young infants: Must the occlusion event be congruent with the occluder? Bremner JG; Slater AM; Mason UC; Spring J; Johnson SP Infant Behav Dev; 2016 Aug; 44():240-8. PubMed ID: 27490421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]