198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21732088)
1. The effects of compression on the image quality of digital panoramic radiographs.
Yasar F; Yesilova E; Apaydın B
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):719-26. PubMed ID: 21732088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of image compression on quantitative measurements of digital panoramic radiographs.
Yasar F; Apaydin B; Yilmaz HH
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Nov; 17(6):e1074-81. PubMed ID: 22926465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of wavelet and discrete cosine transform compression of digital radiographs on the detection of subtle proximal caries. ROC analysis.
Schulze RK; Richter A; d'Hoedt B
Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 18701823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization.
Xavier CR; Araujo-Pires AC; Poleti ML; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ferreira O; Capelozza AL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 21831972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Image Compression on Linear Measurements of Digital Panoramic Radiographs.
Provedel LF; Pimentel BN; Jesus TM; Lacerda AP; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(6):757-760. PubMed ID: 27982191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is JPEG compression of videomicroscopic images compatible with telediagnosis? Comparison between diagnostic performance and pattern recognition on uncompressed TIFF images and JPEG compressed ones.
Seidenari S; Pellacani G; Righi E; Di Nardo A
Telemed J E Health; 2004; 10(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 15650524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system.
Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Mar; 81(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 8653470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of and file format effect on digital subtraction radiography of simulated external root resorptions.
Gegler A; Mahl C; Fontanella V
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jan; 35(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16421257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct digital lateral cephalometry: the effects of JPEG compression on image quality.
Wenger NA; Tewson DH; McDonald F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 16290207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods.
Baksi BG; Fidler A
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 21465294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology.
Baker CF; Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Sanghera P; Hinz BJ; De Leon AR; Greve MD
Can J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 39(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 15696764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of JPEG compression on the diagnostic accuracy of periapical images in the detection of root fracture.
Noujeim M; Geha H; Shintaku W; Bechara B; Kashi KA
Dent Traumatol; 2012 Jun; 28(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 22066949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.
Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Mar; 8(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 14652733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.
Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Full-quality DICOM Images Compared to Minimally Compressed Mammograms in JPEG Format for Radiology Training: A Study From Radiologist and Radiographer Perspectives.
Trieu PDY; Barron M; Lewis SJ
Acad Radiol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 36567143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indirect digital images: limit of image compression for diagnosis in endodontics.
Siragusa M; McDonnell DJ
Int Endod J; 2002 Dec; 35(12):991-5. PubMed ID: 12653317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
