These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21732088)

  • 21. Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression.
    Schreiber D
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 14603591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. JPEG2000 for automated quantification of immunohistochemically stained cell nuclei: a comparative study with standard JPEG format.
    Lejeune M; López C; Bosch R; Korzyńska A; Salvadó MT; García-Rojo M; Neuman U; Witkowski Ł; Baucells J; Jaén J
    Virchows Arch; 2011 Feb; 458(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 21085985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations.
    Gürdal P; Hildebolt CF; Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11175274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs.
    Hellén-Halme K; Lith A; Shi XQ
    Oral Radiol; 2020 Apr; 36(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 31004276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold.
    Lee KH; Kim YH; Kim BH; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim HJ; Hahn S
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1529-34. PubMed ID: 17119972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of scanning parameters reduction in dental radiographs on image quality and diagnostic performance: A randomised controlled trial.
    Ghazali L; Mohd Yusof MYP; Norman NH
    J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 48(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 33200660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points.
    Duarte H; Vieck R; Siqueira DF; Angelieri F; Bommarito S; Dalben G; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):393-400. PubMed ID: 19700533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.
    Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography.
    Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions.
    Koenig L; Parks E; Analoui M; Eckert G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15140821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital image compression in dermatology: format comparison.
    Guarneri F; Vaccaro M; Guarneri C
    Telemed J E Health; 2008 Sep; 14(7):666-70. PubMed ID: 18817495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of JPEG2000 compression on landmark identification of lateral cephalometric digital radiographs.
    Abdelkarim A; Nummikoski P; Gakunga P; Hatch JP; Dove SB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):518-524. PubMed ID: 20889059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions.
    Eraso FE; Analoui M; Watson AB; Rebeschini R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 12075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F; De Meyer AM; Bou Serhal C; Van den Bossche C; Declerck J; Persoons M; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11000322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of image content on detail preservation and file size reduction in lossy compression.
    Fidler A; Skaleric U; Likar B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):387-92. PubMed ID: 17881596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Joint Photographic Experts Group compression of intraoral radiographs for image transmission on the World Wide Web.
    Yuasa H; Ariji Y; Ohki M; Naitoh M; Shiojima M; Ushida M; Ariji E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jul; 88(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 10442952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.
    Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.