These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21732421)

  • 1. Statistical mechanics-based method to extract atomic distance-dependent potentials from protein structures.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2011 Sep; 79(9):2648-61. PubMed ID: 21732421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2008 Aug; 72(2):557-79. PubMed ID: 18247354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Nov; 27(15):1866-75. PubMed ID: 16983673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ANDIS: an atomic angle- and distance-dependent statistical potential for protein structure quality assessment.
    Yu Z; Yao Y; Deng H; Yi M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 31159742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 21830787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. sDFIRE: Sequence-specific statistical energy function for protein structure prediction by decoy selections.
    Hoque MT; Yang Y; Mishra A; Zhou Y
    J Comput Chem; 2016 May; 37(12):1119-24. PubMed ID: 26849026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Protein Sci; 2004 Feb; 13(2):400-11. PubMed ID: 14739325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the orientation-dependent statistical potential using a reference state.
    Liu Y; Zeng J; Gong H
    Proteins; 2014 Oct; 82(10):2383-93. PubMed ID: 24810843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction.
    Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Protein Sci; 2002 Nov; 11(11):2714-26. PubMed ID: 12381853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the best reference state for designing statistical atomic potentials in protein structure prediction?
    Deng H; Jia Y; Wei Y; Zhang Y
    Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(9):2311-22. PubMed ID: 22623012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Derived from Rigid and Flexible Decoy Structures: Evaluation with the 2013 and 2014 CSAR Benchmarks.
    Yan C; Grinter SZ; Merideth BR; Ma Z; Zou X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1013-21. PubMed ID: 26389744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating Bonded and Nonbonded Potentials in the Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Wang X; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):3080-3090. PubMed ID: 31045366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
    Lee MC; Duan Y
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decoy Database Improvement for Protein Folding.
    Yeh HY; Lindsey A; Wu CP; Thomas S; Amato NM
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):823-36. PubMed ID: 26258648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random Forest Refinement of the KECSA2 Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein Decoy Detection.
    Pei J; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1919-1929. PubMed ID: 30726079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Refining near-native protein-protein docking decoys by local resampling and energy minimization.
    Liang S; Wang G; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2009 Aug; 76(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 19156819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators.
    Fogolari F; Tosatto SC; Colombo G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():301. PubMed ID: 16354298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ROTAS: a rotamer-dependent, atomic statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.
    Park J; Saitou K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 15(1):307. PubMed ID: 25236673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the analysis of protein-protein interactions via knowledge-based potentials for the prediction of protein-protein docking.
    Feliu E; Aloy P; Oliva B
    Protein Sci; 2011 Mar; 20(3):529-41. PubMed ID: 21432933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.