These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21733280)

  • 21. How do design features influence consumer attention when looking for nutritional information on food labels? Results from an eye-tracking study on pan bread labels.
    Antúnez L; Vidal L; Sapolinski A; Giménez A; Maiche A; Ares G
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2013 Aug; 64(5):515-27. PubMed ID: 23301795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Point-of-purchase nutrition information influences food-purchasing behaviors of college students: a pilot study.
    Freedman MR; Connors R
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Aug; 110(8):1222-6. PubMed ID: 20656098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements.
    Jones G; Richardson M
    Public Health Nutr; 2007 Mar; 10(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 17288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay.
    Talati Z; Norman R; Pettigrew S; Neal B; Kelly B; Dixon H; Ball K; Miller C; Shilton T
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Dec; 14(1):171. PubMed ID: 29258543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing five front-of-pack nutrition labels' influence on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions.
    Gorski Findling MT; Werth PM; Musicus AA; Bragg MA; Graham DJ; Elbel B; Roberto CA
    Prev Med; 2018 Jan; 106():114-121. PubMed ID: 29066375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soda or VitaSoda: How Product Name Influences Perceptions of Snack Food Healthfulness and the Moderating Role of Nutrition Facts Labels.
    Verrill L; Iles IA; Nan X
    Health Commun; 2020 Jul; 35(8):966-973. PubMed ID: 30961399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do nutrition label readers eat healthier diets? Behavioral correlates of adults' use of food labels.
    Kreuter MW; Brennan LK; Scharff DP; Lukwago SN
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 9236964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts label.
    Dallas SK; Liu PJ; Ubel PA
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():577-84. PubMed ID: 26278876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of food labels by adolescents to make healthier choices on snacks: a cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka.
    Talagala IA; Arambepola C
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Aug; 16():739. PubMed ID: 27502411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consumers' purchase decisions for products with nutrition and health claims: What role do product category and gaze duration on claims play?
    Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104337. PubMed ID: 31260708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age differences in the use of serving size information on food labels: numeracy or attention?
    Miller LM; Applegate E; Beckett LA; Wilson MD; Gibson TN
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Apr; 20(5):786-796. PubMed ID: 28025950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Choosing a front-of-package warning label for Brazil: A randomized, controlled comparison of three different label designs.
    Khandpur N; Mais LA; de Morais Sato P; Martins APB; Spinillo CG; Rojas CFU; Garcia MT; Jaime PC
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():854-861. PubMed ID: 31108818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of explained v. unexplained front-of-package nutrition labels on parent and child food choices: a randomized trial.
    Graham DJ; Lucas-Thompson RG; Mueller MP; Jaeb M; Harnack L
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Apr; 20(5):774-785. PubMed ID: 27745562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of front-of-pack labelling and regulated nutrition claims on consumers' perceptions of product healthfulness and purchase intentions: A randomized controlled trial.
    Franco-Arellano B; Vanderlee L; Ahmed M; Oh A; L'Abbé M
    Appetite; 2020 Jun; 149():104629. PubMed ID: 32061707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attention to Physical Activity-Equivalent Calorie Information on Nutrition Facts Labels: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.
    Wolfson JA; Graham DJ; Bleich SN
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2017 Jan; 49(1):35-42.e1. PubMed ID: 27865642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer purchasing intentions: a randomized experiment in low- and middle-income Mexican adults.
    Jáuregui A; Vargas-Meza J; Nieto C; Contreras-Manzano A; Alejandro NZ; Tolentino-Mayo L; Hall MG; Barquera S
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):463. PubMed ID: 32252716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlates of nutrition label use among college students and young adults: a review.
    Christoph MJ; An R; Ellison B
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Aug; 19(12):2135-48. PubMed ID: 26549218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Food label reading and understanding in parts of rural and urban Zimbabwe.
    Chopera P; Chagwena DT; Mushonga NG
    Afr Health Sci; 2014 Sep; 14(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 25352875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nutrition label processing in the past 10 years: Contributions from eye tracking approach.
    Ma G; Zhuang X
    Appetite; 2021 Jan; 156():104859. PubMed ID: 32916209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.