79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21733597)
1. [A flagrant case of scientific fraud].
Fernández Mondéjar E; Ceraso H
Med Intensiva; 2011; 35(6):323-7. PubMed ID: 21733597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The pain drug fraud scandal: implications for clinicians, investigators, and journals.
Lipman AG
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 19670016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paper retracted as co-author admits forgery.
Adam D
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):775. PubMed ID: 12594468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer-Review Fraud--Hacking the Scientific Publication Process.
Haug CJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(25):2393-5. PubMed ID: 26488392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The aftermath of scientific fraud.
Bonetta L
Cell; 2006 Mar; 124(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 16530031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited.
Campanario JM
Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):288. PubMed ID: 11099018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Fraud charges cast doubt on claims of DNA damage from cell phone fields.
Vogel G
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5893):1144-5. PubMed ID: 18755946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Research in anesthesia: fraud, police and professionalism].
Donati F
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Jan; 32(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 23260629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation into data fraud results in heart researcher's dismissal.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6208. PubMed ID: 21952465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
Roehr B
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The road to fraud starts with a single step.
Crocker J
Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):151. PubMed ID: 22071724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities.
Callaway E
Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7371):15. PubMed ID: 22051650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Universite de Montréal in the dark about fraud.
Kondro W
CMAJ; 2005 May; 172(10):1278. PubMed ID: 15883394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Facing up to fraud.
Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fraud. The journal's role concerning fraudulent research.
Sharp DW
Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun; 26(6):586-9. PubMed ID: 1860767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
