These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21735253)

  • 1. 'Lassoing' a phylogenetic tree I: basic properties, shellings, and covers.
    Dress AW; Huber KT; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2012 Jul; 65(1):77-105. PubMed ID: 21735253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lassoing and corralling rooted phylogenetic trees.
    Huber KT; Popescu AA
    Bull Math Biol; 2013 Mar; 75(3):444-65. PubMed ID: 23381929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimum triplet covers of binary phylogenetic X-trees.
    Huber KT; Moulton V; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2017 Dec; 75(6-7):1827-1840. PubMed ID: 28608005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding phylogenetic trees in terms of weighted quartets.
    Grünewald S; Huber KT; Moulton V; Semple C
    J Math Biol; 2008 Apr; 56(4):465-77. PubMed ID: 17891538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovering normal networks from shortest inter-taxa distance information.
    Bordewich M; Huber KT; Moulton V; Semple C
    J Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 77(3):571-594. PubMed ID: 29478083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tree-average distances on certain phylogenetic networks have their weights uniquely determined.
    Willson SJ
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012; 7():13. PubMed ID: 22587565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconstructing (super)trees from data sets with missing distances: not all is lost.
    Kettleborough G; Dicks J; Roberts IN; Huber KT
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):1628-42. PubMed ID: 25657329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computing nearest neighbour interchange distances between ranked phylogenetic trees.
    Collienne L; Gavryushkin A
    J Math Biol; 2021 Jan; 82(1-2):8. PubMed ID: 33492606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The expected loss of feature diversity (versus phylogenetic diversity) following rapid extinction at the present.
    Overwater M; Pelletier D; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2023 Sep; 87(3):53. PubMed ID: 37658909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of certain phylogenetic networks from their tree-average distances.
    Willson SJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2013 Oct; 75(10):1840-78. PubMed ID: 23864219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring Metric Trees from Weighted Quartets via an Intertaxon Distance.
    Yourdkhani S; Rhodes JA
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jul; 82(7):97. PubMed ID: 32676801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models.
    Chauve C; Ponty Y; Wallner M
    J Math Biol; 2020 Apr; 80(5):1353-1388. PubMed ID: 32060618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bounds for phylogenetic network space metrics.
    Francis A; Huber KT; Moulton V; Wu T
    J Math Biol; 2018 Apr; 76(5):1229-1248. PubMed ID: 28836230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact and interplay of long and short branches on phylogenetic information content.
    Martyn I; Steel M
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Dec; 314():157-63. PubMed ID: 22981922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distribution and asymptotic behavior of the phylogenetic transfer distance.
    Dávila Felipe M; Domelevo Entfellner JB; Lemoine F; Truszkowski J; Gascuel O
    J Math Biol; 2019 Jul; 79(2):485-508. PubMed ID: 31037350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient FPT Algorithms for (Strict) Compatibility of Unrooted Phylogenetic Trees.
    Baste J; Paul C; Sau I; Scornavacca C
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Apr; 79(4):920-938. PubMed ID: 28247121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent.
    Allman ES; Degnan JH; Rhodes JA
    J Math Biol; 2011 Jun; 62(6):833-62. PubMed ID: 20652704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconciling event-labeled gene trees with MUL-trees and species networks.
    Hellmuth M; Huber KT; Moulton V
    J Math Biol; 2019 Oct; 79(5):1885-1925. PubMed ID: 31410552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When is a Phylogenetic Network Simply an Amalgamation of Two Trees?
    Semple C; Simpson J
    Bull Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 80(9):2338-2348. PubMed ID: 29981001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.