These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21735313)

  • 1. The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.
    Li Z; Phillips J; Durgin FH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2205-17. PubMed ID: 21735313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judgments of exocentric direction in large-scale space.
    Kelly JW; Loomis JM; Beall AC
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 15222392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual space in the dark affected by the intrinsic bias of the visual system.
    Ooi TL; Wu B; He ZJ
    Perception; 2006; 35(5):605-24. PubMed ID: 16836053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-dimensional and multi-dimensional studies of the exocentric distance estimates in frontoparallel plane, virtual space, and outdoor open field.
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Matsushima EH; Ribeiro-Filho NP; Da Silva JA
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 17120706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two theories of perceived distance on the ground plane: The angular expansion hypothesis and the intrinsic bias hypothesis.
    Li Z; Durgin FH
    Iperception; 2012 Jan; 3(5):368-383. PubMed ID: 22792434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived azimuth direction is exaggerated: Converging evidence from explicit and implicit measures.
    Li Z; Durgin FH
    J Vis; 2016; 16(1):4. PubMed ID: 26756174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.
    Li Z; Sun E; Strawser CJ; Spiegel A; Klein B; Durgin FH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):477-93. PubMed ID: 22889186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual distance estimation in static compared to moving virtual scenes.
    Frenz H; Lappe M
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 17120711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gaze direction and the extraction of egocentric distance.
    Gajewski DA; Wallin CP; Philbeck JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1739-51. PubMed ID: 24927944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual scale expansion: an efficient angular coding strategy for locomotor space.
    Durgin FH; Li Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1856-70. PubMed ID: 21594732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental surfaces and the compression of perceived visual space.
    Bian Z; Andersen GJ
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 21669858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frontal extents in virtual environments are not immune to underperception.
    Kelly JW; Hammel W; Sjolund LA; Siegel ZD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1848-53. PubMed ID: 26105656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
    Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging and the perception of egocentric distance.
    Bian Z; Andersen GJ
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Sep; 28(3):813-25. PubMed ID: 23276215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can exocentric direction be dissociated from its exocentric distance in virtual environments?
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Matsushima EH; Da Silva JA; Ribeiro-Filho NP
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Apr; 70(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 18459265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial judgments of exocentric extents in an open-field situation: familiar versus unfamiliar size.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct; 50(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 1758767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space.
    Neggers SF; Van der Lubbe RH; Ramsey NF; Postma A
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):320-31. PubMed ID: 16473025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.