143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21735331)
1. Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.
Ariel R; Al-Harthy IS; Was CA; Dunlosky J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21735331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.
Dunlosky J; Ariel R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):899-912. PubMed ID: 21480756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?
Ariel R; Dunlosky J
Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):416-28. PubMed ID: 23135748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Allocation of Study Time in Chinese Junior School Students: Habitual Responding, Item Difficulty, and Time Constraints.
Wang F; Qin Q; Jiang Y
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():639. PubMed ID: 27199865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning what to learn: the effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time.
Ariel R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1697-1711. PubMed ID: 23751010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of individual thinking styles on item selection during study time allocation.
Jia X; Li W; Cao L; Li P; Shi M; Wang J; Cao W; Li X
Int J Psychol; 2018 Apr; 53(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 26987560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bisections in two languages: when number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact.
Kazandjian S; Cavézian C; Zivotofsky AZ; Chokron S
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4031-7. PubMed ID: 20965204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial biases in mental arithmetic are independent of reading/writing habits: Evidence from French and Arabic speakers.
Masson N; Andres M; Alsamour M; Bollen Z; Pesenti M
Cognition; 2020 Jul; 200():104262. PubMed ID: 32480066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.
Kazandjian S; Dupierrix E; Gaash E; Love IY; Zivotofsky AZ; De Agostini M; Chokron S
Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1247():133-41. PubMed ID: 18973747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional asymmetry between visual hemifields is related to habitual direction of reading and its implications for debate on cause and effects of dyslexia.
Kermani M; Verghese A; Vidyasagar TR
Dyslexia; 2018 Feb; 24(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 29214682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Language on Spatial Reasoning: Reading Habits Modulate the Formulation of Conclusions and the Integration of Premises.
Castelain T; Van der Henst JB
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():654266. PubMed ID: 34079496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of aesthetic preferences among Roman and Arabic script readers.
Heath RL; Mahmasanni O; Rouhana A; Nassif N
Laterality; 2005 Sep; 10(5):399-411. PubMed ID: 16191811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring.
Ariel R; Dunlosky J; Bailey H
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):432-47. PubMed ID: 19653800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli.
Nachshon I
Int J Neurosci; 1985 Jan; 25(3-4):161-74. PubMed ID: 3884523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age differences in item selection behaviors and subsequent memory for new foreign language vocabulary: Evidence for a region of proximal learning heuristic.
Hertzog C; Price J; Murray R
Psychol Aging; 2020 Dec; 35(8):1059-1072. PubMed ID: 33001664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phonological and orthographic vocabulary knowledge and processing speed of L2 written text: the case of native Arabic EFL learners.
Masrai A
Cogn Process; 2021 Feb; 22(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 32862339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metacognitive control: Shifting from habitual to agenda processes on item selection during study in elementary school children.
Li W; Ji H; Li F; Li P; Zhang Y; Li X
Br J Educ Psychol; 2016 Dec; 86(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 27739062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavioural asymmetries on the greyscales task: The influence of native reading direction.
Friedrich TE; Elias LJ
Cult Brain; 2014; 2(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 25505645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Up or down? Reading direction influences vertical counting direction in the horizontal plane - a cross-cultural comparison.
Göbel SM
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():228. PubMed ID: 25852583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Native reading direction and corresponding preferences for left- or right-lit images.
Smith AK; Elias LJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):355-67. PubMed ID: 24032316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]