These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21736111)
21. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Constitution at the threshold of life and death: a suggested approach to accommodate an interest in life and a right to die. Allen MP Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):971-1020. PubMed ID: 15529470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sustaining quality of life for patients with terminal illnesses. Rago JT; Poljak S Leg Med; 1986; ():216-34. PubMed ID: 3312891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [End of life in neonatal medicine in the light of French law]. Dageville C; Rameix S; Andrini P; Betrémieux P; Jarreau PH; Kuhn P; Oriot D; Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 May; 36(5):571-81. PubMed ID: 18468938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. ABA endorses Uniform Act on health-care decision-making by proxy. Hawaii Med J; 1990 May; 49(5):172. PubMed ID: 2380063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. After Cruzan: The right to die. Lippman H RN; 1991 Jan; 54(1):65-6, 68, 70, 73. PubMed ID: 1989061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Our third home. Lobbying for patient advocacy. Gildemeister L Wash Nurse; 1993; 23(1):9, 12. PubMed ID: 8430509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case. Obade CC J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Northern Territory. Rights of the terminally act. Perron M Lamp; 1996 Aug; 53(7):17-8. PubMed ID: 9313494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Autonomy and human dignity in medicine--ethical and legal questions]. Körner U Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1994 Oct; 88(10):731-2. PubMed ID: 7825352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Patient advance directives in the tension field between euthanasia and palliative care: "there is no simple solution"]. Kobusch D Pflege Z; 2008 Feb; 61(2):66-7. PubMed ID: 18386680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Family role in health care decision making. Lynn J Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 8453245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Oregon's fight over the right to die. Campbell CS Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(2):3. PubMed ID: 8026936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Need for clear and convincing evidence of a patient's wishes before artificial nutrition and hydration may be withdrawn. Brushwood DB Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 47(12):2720-2. PubMed ID: 2278289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pernicious encroachment into end-of-life decision making: federal intervention in palliative pain treatment. Bolin JN Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(5):34-6; discussion W30-2. PubMed ID: 16997822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Medical Treatment Act. Andrews K Med J Aust; 1989 Jan; 150(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 2462664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Psychological observations on assisted death: motifs of health experts: patient will must be in first place]. de Vocht H; Nyatanga B Pflege Z; 2008 Dec; 61(12):682-5. PubMed ID: 19186881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Cruzan case--no right to die. Fiesta J Nurs Manage; 1990 Sep; 21(9):22. PubMed ID: 2402372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]