These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21737261)

  • 1. Co-firing of coal and manure biomass: a TG-MS approach.
    Otero M; Sánchez ME; Gómez X
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Sep; 102(17):8304-9. PubMed ID: 21737261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thermogravimetric analysis of biowastes during combustion.
    Otero M; Sanchez ME; Gómez X; Morán A
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1183-7. PubMed ID: 20079622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Co-combustion of different sewage sludge and coal: a non-isothermal thermogravimetric kinetic analysis.
    Otero M; Calvo LF; Gil MV; García AI; Morán A
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Sep; 99(14):6311-9. PubMed ID: 18255288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thermal behaviour and kinetics of coal/biomass blends during co-combustion.
    Gil MV; Casal D; Pevida C; Pis JJ; Rubiera F
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jul; 101(14):5601-8. PubMed ID: 20189802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of sewage sludge blending on the coal combustion: a thermogravimetric assessment.
    Otero M; Gómez X; García AI; Morán A
    Chemosphere; 2007 Nov; 69(11):1740-50. PubMed ID: 17624399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation into the co-pyrolysis behaviors of cow manure and coal blending by TG-MS.
    Ma M; Bai Y; Song X; Wang J; Su W; Yao M; Yu G
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 728():138828. PubMed ID: 32361111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thermogravimetric characterization of dairy manure as pyrolysis and combustion feedstocks.
    Wu H; Hanna MA; Jones DD
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1066-71. PubMed ID: 22767875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of blend ratio on the co-firing of a commercial torrefied biomass and coal via analysis of oxidation kinetics.
    Goldfarb JL; Liu C
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 149():208-15. PubMed ID: 24113546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shea meal and cotton stalk as potential fuels for co-combustion with coal.
    Munir S; Nimmo W; Gibbs BM
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Oct; 101(19):7614-23. PubMed ID: 20483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite.
    Toptas A; Yildirim Y; Duman G; Yanik J
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Feb; 177():328-36. PubMed ID: 25496955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thermogravimetric analysis of the behavior of sub-bituminous coal and cellulosic ethanol residue during co-combustion.
    Buratti C; Barbanera M; Bartocci P; Fantozzi F
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jun; 186():154-162. PubMed ID: 25817025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaction and kinetic analysis for coal and biomass co-gasification by TG-FTIR.
    Xu C; Hu S; Xiang J; Zhang L; Sun L; Shuai C; Chen Q; He L; Edreis EM
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 154():313-21. PubMed ID: 24412857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Life cycle assessment of swine and dairy manure: pyrolysis and combustion processes.
    Fernandez-Lopez M; Puig-Gamero M; Lopez-Gonzalez D; Avalos-Ramirez A; Valverde J; Sanchez-Silva L
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Apr; 182():184-192. PubMed ID: 25698410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Co-combustion of agricultural residues with coal in a fluidized bed combustor.
    Ghani WA; Alias AB; Savory RM; Cliffe KR
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):767-73. PubMed ID: 18614348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The co-combustion performance and reaction kinetics of refuse derived fuels with South African high ash coal.
    Isaac K; Bada SO
    Heliyon; 2020 Jan; 6(1):e03309. PubMed ID: 32021941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of fuel side costs due to biomass co-combustion.
    Wils A; Calmano W; Dettmann P; Kaltschmitt M; Ecke H
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Mar; 207-208():147-51. PubMed ID: 21514049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thermochemical and trace element behavior of coal gangue, agricultural biomass and their blends during co-combustion.
    Zhou C; Liu G; Cheng S; Fang T; Lam PK
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 166():243-51. PubMed ID: 24914998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thermogravimetric study of the combustion of Tetraselmis suecica microalgae and its blend with a Victorian brown coal in O2/N2 and O2/CO2 atmospheres.
    Tahmasebi A; Kassim MA; Yu J; Bhattacharya S
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 150():15-27. PubMed ID: 24140946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combustion characteristics of coal and refuse from passenger trains.
    Fu-min R; Feng Y; Ming G; Min Y
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1196-205. PubMed ID: 20093000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling of pyrolysis of coal-biomass blends using thermogravimetric analysis.
    Sadhukhan AK; Gupta P; Goyal T; Saha RK
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Nov; 99(17):8022-6. PubMed ID: 18485697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.