150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21737524)
21. New public health services and systems research agenda: directions for the next decade.
Scutchfield FD; Pérez DJ; Monroe JA; Howard AF
Am J Prev Med; 2012 May; 42(5 Suppl 1):S1-5. PubMed ID: 22502922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of a community care research agenda for Australia.
Lewin G; Burton E; Sparrow P; Carroll M; Kendig H
Australas J Ageing; 2011 Mar; 30(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 21395939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An evaluation of Oregon's Medicaid rationing algorithms.
Tengs TO
Health Econ; 1996; 5(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 8817293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Centers tapped to evaluate technology.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(38):20, 22. PubMed ID: 10170392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Rationing health care: does it work?
Kohler PO; Childress MD
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2002; 65(3):13-7. PubMed ID: 12298401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Rationing health care.
Craig TJ
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2002; 65(4):61. PubMed ID: 12592986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Norwegian priority guidelines: estimating the distributional implications across age, gender and SES.
Carlsen F; Kaarboe OM
Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):264-70. PubMed ID: 20060613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, DELIBERATIVE PROCESS, AND ETHICALLY CONTESTED ISSUES.
Daniels N; van der Wilt GJ
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(1-2):10-5. PubMed ID: 27472157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Priority setting: (not) an issue for rehabilitation?].
Mittag O; Jäckel WH
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2012 Apr; 51(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 22570152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. AHRQ's free research can help plans anticipate coverage issues.
Roberts DC; Schoelles K
Manag Care; 2013 Oct; 22(10):41-4. PubMed ID: 24344527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Health care priorities as a problem of local resource allocation.
Kinnunen J; Lammintakanen J; Myllykangas M; Ryynänen OP; Takala J
Int J Health Plann Manage; 1998; 13(3):216-29. PubMed ID: 10187287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A plan to strengthen public health in the United States.
Public Health Rep; 1991; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-85. PubMed ID: 1946916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Report from the Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute (MTPPI).
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1996; 12(4):765-6. PubMed ID: 9136484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Healthcare Resource Allocation and Priority-setting. A European Challenge.
Di Costanzo C
Eur J Health Law; 2020 Mar; 27(2):93-114. PubMed ID: 33652412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Deliberative participation of citizens in the prioritisation debate: what is their contribution?].
Stumpf S; Raspe H
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 22857729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The setting of health research priorities in a new South Africa.
Parry CD; Yach D; Tollman SM
S Afr Med J; 1992 Nov; 82(5):306-8. PubMed ID: 1448708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospects for health-systems research.
Bennett S; Oxman A; Haines A
Lancet; 2008 Jun; 371(9628):1913. PubMed ID: 18539219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Report from the EUR-ASSESS Project.
Werkö L; Banta D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1995; 11(4):797-9. PubMed ID: 8567214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Towards a knowledge based health service.
Smith R
BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):217-8. PubMed ID: 8069135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Prioritization: the clinical perspective].
Wallesch CW
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2012 Apr; 51(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 22570159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
