These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21738060)

  • 1. Can we trust ex vivo mechanical testing of fresh--frozen cadaveric specimens? The effect of postfreezing delays.
    Cartner JL; Hartsell ZM; Ricci WM; Tornetta P
    J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Aug; 25(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 21738060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical screw pullout strength and effective shear stress in synthetic third generation composite femurs.
    Zdero R; Rose S; Schemitsch EH; Papini M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 17408335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
    Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
    Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A short plate compression screw with diagonal bolts--a biomechanical evaluation performed experimentally and by numerical computation.
    Peleg E; Mosheiff R; Liebergall M; Mattan Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):963-8. PubMed ID: 16893595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?
    Hak DJ; Althausen P; Hazelwood SJ
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Apr; 24(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 20335752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical evaluation of a 4-mm cancellous "rescue" screw in osteoporotic cortical bone: a cadaveric study.
    Wall SJ; Soin SP; Knight TA; Mears SC; Belkoff SM
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):379-82. PubMed ID: 20502222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
    O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation.
    Eck JC; Walker MP; Currier BL; Chen Q; Yaszemski MJ; An KN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 17912127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
    Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress relaxation at the bone-pedicle screw interface in human bone.
    Inceoğlu S; Akbay A; McLain RF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1321-6. PubMed ID: 16721293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of biomechanical stability and pullout strength of two C1-C2 fixation constructs.
    Savage JW; Limthongkul W; Park HS; Zhang LQ; Karaikovic EE
    Spine J; 2011 Jul; 11(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 21640660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.
    Richards DP; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Jul; 21(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16012500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of dilation of immature pedicles on pullout strength of the screws: Part 2: In vivo study.
    Yilmaz G; Demirkiran G; Ozkan C; Daglioglu K; Pekmezci M; Alanay A; Yazici M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2378-83. PubMed ID: 19829250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis.
    Wolf RS; Zheng N; Weichel D
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Feb; 21(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 15689867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.