BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21738100)

  • 1. Intraoperative waste in spine surgery: incidence, cost, and effectiveness of an educational program.
    Soroceanu A; Canacari E; Brown E; Robinson A; McGuire KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(19):E1270-3. PubMed ID: 21738100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative waste of trauma implants: a cost burden to hospitals worth addressing?
    Zywiel MG; Delanois RE; McGrath MS; Ulrich SD; Duncan JL; Mont MA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009; 23(10):710-5. PubMed ID: 19858979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthopedic Implant Waste: Analysis and Quantification.
    Payne A; Slover J; Inneh I; Hutzler L; Iorio R; Bosco JA
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Dec; 44(12):554-60. PubMed ID: 26665242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ASA grade and Charlson Comorbidity Index of spinal surgery patients: correlation with complications and societal costs.
    Whitmore RG; Stephen JH; Vernick C; Campbell PG; Yadla S; Ghobrial GM; Maltenfort MG; Ratliff JK
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23602377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the cost burden of surgical implant waste? An analysis of surgical implant waste in an orthopedics and trauma surgery department of a French university hospital in 2016.
    Laurut T; Duran C; Pages A; Morin MC; Cavaignac E
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Oct; 105(6):1205-1209. PubMed ID: 31473131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols.
    Rampersaud YR; Moro ER; Neary MA; White K; Lewis SJ; Massicotte EM; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1503-10. PubMed ID: 16741462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery.
    Slover J; Abdu WA; Hanscom B; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1974-80. PubMed ID: 16924216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost analysis of prophylactic intraoperative cystoscopic ureteral stents in gynecologic surgery.
    Fanning J; Fenton B; Jean GM; Chae C
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2011 Dec; 111(12):667-9. PubMed ID: 22182952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of prophylactic large dose of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Elwatidy S; Jamjoom Z; Elgamal E; Zakaria A; Turkistani A; El-Dawlatly A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2577-80. PubMed ID: 19011538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standardizing to control costs of spinal implants.
    Saver C
    OR Manager; 2013 Jan; 29(1):14-5, 18. PubMed ID: 23393767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost effectiveness.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2014; 53(3):255. PubMed ID: 24751208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sacral tumor resection: the effect of surgical staging on patient outcomes, resource management, and hospital cost.
    Brown MJ; Kor DJ; Curry TB; Warner MA; Rodrigues ES; Rose SH; Dekutoski MB; Moriarty JP; Long KH; Rose PS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(19):1570-8. PubMed ID: 21245786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mild hypothermia, blood loss and complications in elective spinal surgery.
    Guest JD; Vanni S; Silbert L
    Spine J; 2004; 4(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15016389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative assessment of breast cancer specimens decreases cost and number of reoperations.
    Uecker JM; Bui EH; Foulkrod KH; Sabra JP
    Am Surg; 2011 Mar; 77(3):342-4. PubMed ID: 21375848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Major neurologic deficit immediately after adult spinal surgery: incidence and etiology over 10 years at a single training institution.
    Cramer DE; Maher PC; Pettigrew DB; Kuntz C
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):565-70. PubMed ID: 19956030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of a combined current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm in classifying cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes.
    Wang MC; Laud PW; Macias M; Nattinger AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(22):1843-8. PubMed ID: 21245779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spine adverse events severity system: content validation and interobserver reliability assessment.
    Rampersaud YR; Neary MA; White K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(7):790-5. PubMed ID: 20195203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost awareness and cost containment at the Hospital for Special Surgery. Strategies and total hip replacement cost centers.
    Levine DB; Cole BJ; Rodeo SA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):117-24. PubMed ID: 7634565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual loss after spine surgery: a population-based study.
    Patil CG; Lad EM; Lad SP; Ho C; Boakye M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1491-6. PubMed ID: 18520945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence and cost of intraoperative waste of hip and knee arthroplasty implants.
    Zywiel MG; Ulrich SD; Suda AJ; Duncan JL; McGrath MS; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 19447003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.