240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21738136)
1. Supreme Court decision on patent for HIV test unlikely to set major precedent.
Waters H
Nat Med; 2011 Jul; 17(7):758. PubMed ID: 21738136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent Supreme Court decisions and licensing power.
Giordano-Coltart J; Calkins CW
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 18259170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supreme Court ruling prompts universities to tighten employee contracts.
Roberts JP
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Aug; 29(8):678. PubMed ID: 21822232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.
Marshall E
Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):163. PubMed ID: 21474725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who owns federally funded research? The Supreme court and the Bayh-Dole act.
Kesselheim AS; Rajkumar R
N Engl J Med; 2011 Sep; 365(13):1167-9. PubMed ID: 21879888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Intellectual property. Universities ask Supreme Court to reverse patent ruling.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):26-7. PubMed ID: 12511618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Intellectual property. What good is a patent? Supreme Court may suggest an answer.
Kintisch E
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5763):946-7. PubMed ID: 16484470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA patent decision leaves questions for diagnostics.
Harrison C
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2011 Aug; 10(9):650-1. PubMed ID: 21878971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court boosts licensees in biotech patent battles.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 25(3):264-5. PubMed ID: 17344866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme Court to decide whether payments by patent holders to delay production of generics are anticompetitive.
Roehr B
BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e8464. PubMed ID: 23236054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patent watch: Supreme Court decision impacts the strength of US patents.
Brinckerhoff CC
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2016 Jul; 15(8):524. PubMed ID: 27469227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
Robertson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.
Marshall E
Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patent watch: US Supreme Court revises patent claim construction standards.
Noonan K
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2015 Mar; 14(3):157. PubMed ID: 25722233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Supreme Court hears argument on patenting life forms.
Science; 1980 Apr; 208(4439):31-2. PubMed ID: 7361104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pharmaceutical patent life-cycle management after KSR v. Teleflex.
Furrow ME
Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(1):275-320. PubMed ID: 18561462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patent law rulings work in favor of generics.
Sipkoff M
Manag Care; 2007 Sep; 16(9):12, 14. PubMed ID: 17969743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patent protection of diagnostic technology: will recent US Supreme Court decisions change patent strategy?
Komatani TS
Pharm Pat Anal; 2015; 4(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 26451906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case.
Sklan A
Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Sep; 2(5):581. PubMed ID: 24237164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. KSR v. Teleflex. Part 2: Impact of U.S Supreme Court Patent Law on Canadian and global systems-based innovation ecologies.
Bouchard RA
Health Law J; 2007; 15():247-94. PubMed ID: 19702185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
