163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21738600)
1. On identifying the optimal number of population clusters via the deviance information criterion.
Gao H; Bryc K; Bustamante CD
PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e21014. PubMed ID: 21738600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel Bayesian semiparametric algorithm for inferring population structure and adjusting for case-control association tests.
Majumdar A; Bhattacharya S; Basu A; Ghosh S
Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 23432096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian model selection for incomplete data using the posterior predictive distribution.
Daniels MJ; Chatterjee AS; Wang C
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22551040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A one-step-ahead pseudo-DIC for comparison of Bayesian state-space models.
Millar RB; McKechnie S
Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):972-80. PubMed ID: 25370730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A spatial dirichlet process mixture model for clustering population genetics data.
Reich BJ; Bondell HD
Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 20825394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of a Bayesian genetic clustering algorithm based on a Dirichlet process prior and comparison among Bayesian clustering methods.
Onogi A; Nurimoto M; Morita M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jun; 12():263. PubMed ID: 21708038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian model selection techniques as decision support for shaping a statistical analysis plan of a clinical trial: an example from a vertigo phase III study with longitudinal count data as primary endpoint.
Adrion C; Mansmann U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Sep; 12():137. PubMed ID: 22962944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) in Bayesian Multiple QTL Mapping.
Shriner D; Yi N
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2009 Mar; 53(5):1850-1860. PubMed ID: 20161286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing DIC and WAIC for multilevel models with missing data.
Du H; Keller B; Alacam E; Enders C
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):2731-2750. PubMed ID: 37864117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The K = 2 conundrum.
Janes JK; Miller JM; Dupuis JR; Malenfant RM; Gorrell JC; Cullingham CI; Andrew RL
Mol Ecol; 2017 Jul; 26(14):3594-3602. PubMed ID: 28544181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The potential of clustering methods to define intersection test scenarios: Assessing real-life performance of AEB.
Sander U; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():1-11. PubMed ID: 29355748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AMOVA-based clustering of population genetic data.
Meirmans PG
J Hered; 2012; 103(5):744-50. PubMed ID: 22896561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Bayesian clustering and edge detection methods for inferring boundaries in landscape genetics.
Safner T; Miller MP; McRae BH; Fortin MJ; Manel S
Int J Mol Sci; 2011 Jan; 12(2):865-89. PubMed ID: 21541031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing hierarchical models via the marginalized deviance information criterion.
Quintero A; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(16):2440-2454. PubMed ID: 29579777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of close relatives on unsupervised Bayesian clustering algorithms in population genetic structure analysis.
RodrÃguez-Ramilo ST; Wang J
Mol Ecol Resour; 2012 Sep; 12(5):873-84. PubMed ID: 22639868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An ABC Method for Whole-Genome Sequence Data: Inferring Paleolithic and Neolithic Human Expansions.
Jay F; Boitard S; Austerlitz F
Mol Biol Evol; 2019 Jul; 36(7):1565-1579. PubMed ID: 30785202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendations for utilizing and reporting population genetic analyses: the reproducibility of genetic clustering using the program STRUCTURE.
Gilbert KJ; Andrew RL; Bock DG; Franklin MT; Kane NC; Moore JS; Moyers BT; Renaut S; Rennison DJ; Veen T; Vines TH
Mol Ecol; 2012 Oct; 21(20):4925-30. PubMed ID: 22998190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison.
Plummer M
Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):523-39. PubMed ID: 18209015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coalescent Simulation with msprime.
Kelleher J; Lohse K
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():191-230. PubMed ID: 31975169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian gamma frailty models for survival data with semi-competing risks and treatment switching.
Zhang Y; Chen MH; Ibrahim JG; Zeng D; Chen Q; Pan Z; Xue X
Lifetime Data Anal; 2014 Jan; 20(1):76-105. PubMed ID: 23543121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
