229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21739137)
1. Application of support vector regression to genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits.
Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
Theor Appl Genet; 2011 Nov; 123(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21739137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting complex traits using a diffusion kernel on genetic markers with an application to dairy cattle and wheat data.
Morota G; Koyama M; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jun; 45(1):17. PubMed ID: 23763755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Multiple-Trait Bayesian Lasso for Genome-Enabled Analysis and Prediction of Complex Traits.
Gianola D; Fernando RL
Genetics; 2020 Feb; 214(2):305-331. PubMed ID: 31879318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between linear and non-parametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat.
Pérez-Rodríguez P; Gianola D; González-Camacho JM; Crossa J; Manès Y; Dreisigacker S
G3 (Bethesda); 2012 Dec; 2(12):1595-605. PubMed ID: 23275882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: a case study with Jersey cows and wheat.
Gianola D; Okut H; Weigel KA; Rosa GJ
BMC Genet; 2011 Oct; 12():87. PubMed ID: 21981731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic-enabled prediction with classification algorithms.
Ornella L; Pérez P; Tapia E; González-Camacho JM; Burgueño J; Zhang X; Singh S; Vicente FS; Bonnett D; Dreisigacker S; Singh R; Long N; Crossa J
Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Jun; 112(6):616-26. PubMed ID: 24424163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome-enabled prediction of reproductive traits in Nellore cattle using parametric models and machine learning methods.
Alves AAC; Espigolan R; Bresolin T; Costa RM; Fernandes Júnior GA; Ventura RV; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG
Anim Genet; 2021 Feb; 52(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 33191532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting expected progeny difference for marbling score in Angus cattle using artificial neural networks and Bayesian regression models.
Okut H; Wu XL; Rosa GJ; Bauck S; Woodward BW; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Gianola D
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):34. PubMed ID: 24024641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers.
Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Kranis A; González-Recio O
Genet Res (Camb); 2010 Jun; 92(3):209-25. PubMed ID: 20667165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
Waldmann P
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model averaging for genome-enabled prediction with reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: a case study with pig litter size and wheat yield.
Tusell L; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Forni S; Gianola D
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Apr; 131(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24397267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.
De los Campos G; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Crossa J
Genet Res (Camb); 2010 Aug; 92(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 20943010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marker-assisted prediction of non-additive genetic values.
Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
Genetica; 2011 Jul; 139(7):843-54. PubMed ID: 21674154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction.
Gianola D; Schön CC
G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Oct; 6(10):3107-3128. PubMed ID: 27489209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. (Quasi) multitask support vector regression with heuristic hyperparameter optimization for whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a case study with carcass traits in broilers.
Alves AAC; Fernandes AFA; Lopes FB; Breen V; Hawken R; Gianola D; Rosa GJM
G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37216670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action.
Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhi A; Kranis A; Tusell L; Morota G; Rosa GJM; Gianola D
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12309. PubMed ID: 30120288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
