These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21740238)

  • 1. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA; Eskelson E; Cavalli V; Liporoni PC; Jorge AO; do Rego MA
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Cazzaniga G; Ottobelli M; Ionescu AC; Paolone G; Gherlone E; Ferracane JL; Brambilla E
    J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():43-52. PubMed ID: 28750776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N; Yilmaz F
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth-colored materials.
    Celik C; Ozgünaltay G
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 19862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different polishing systems and drinks on the color stability of resin composite.
    Berber A; Cakir FY; Baseren M; Gurgan S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 24309346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage.
    Cenci MS; Venturini D; Pereira-Cenci T; Piva E; Demarco FF
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 18435191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system.
    da Costa JB; Goncalves F; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21702670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish.
    Atabek D; Sillelioglu H; Olmez A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 20533638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems.
    Ergücü Z; Türkün LS; Aladag A
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 18666499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.