192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21740426)
1. Spatially-dense 3D facial asymmetry assessment in both typical and disordered growth.
Claes P; Walters M; Vandermeulen D; Clement JG
J Anat; 2011 Oct; 219(4):444-55. PubMed ID: 21740426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial asymmetry assessment in skeletal Class III patients with spatially-dense geometric morphometrics.
Fan Y; He W; Chen G; Song G; Matthews H; Claes P; Jiang R; Xu T
Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):155-162. PubMed ID: 34180974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics.
Claes P; Walters M; Shriver MD; Puts D; Gibson G; Clement J; Baynam G; Verbeke G; Vandermeulen D; Suetens P
J Anat; 2012 Aug; 221(2):97-114. PubMed ID: 22702244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring asymmetry from high-density 3D surface scans: An application to human faces.
Ekrami O; Claes P; White JD; Zaidi AA; Shriver MD; Van Dongen S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207895. PubMed ID: 30586353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison.
Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facial surface morphology predicts variation in internal skeletal shape.
Young NM; Sherathiya K; Gutierrez L; Nguyen E; Bekmezian S; Huang JC; Hallgrímsson B; Lee JS; Marcucio RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 27021454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust and regional 3D facial asymmetry assessment in hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation anomalies.
Walters M; Claes P; Kakulas E; Clement JG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22749574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of regional asymmetry of the face before and after surgical correction of unilateral cleft lip.
Al-Rudainy D; Ju X; Stanton S; Mehendale FV; Ayoub A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):974-978. PubMed ID: 29752048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.
Huang CS; Liu XQ; Chen YR
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 23324075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial asymmetry and genetic ancestry in Latin American admixed populations.
Quinto-Sánchez M; Adhikari K; Acuña-Alonzo V; Cintas C; Silva de Cerqueira CC; Ramallo V; Castillo L; Farrera A; Jaramillo C; Arias W; Fuentes M; Everardo P; de Avila F; Gomez-Valdés J; Hünemeier T; Gibbon S; Gallo C; Poletti G; Rosique J; Bortolini MC; Canizales-Quinteros S; Rothhammer F; Bedoya G; Ruiz-Linares A; González-José R
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 May; 157(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 25582401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between landmark and surface-based three-dimensional analyses of facial asymmetry in adults.
Alqattan M; Djordjevic J; Zhurov AI; Richmond S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24152377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nasal Septal Deviation and Facial Skeletal Asymmetries.
Hartman C; Holton N; Miller S; Yokley T; Marshall S; Srinivasan S; Southard T
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2016 Mar; 299(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 26677010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: a 3-dimensional data analysis.
Meyer-Marcotty P; Alpers GW; Gerdes AB; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):168.e1-8; discussion 168-9. PubMed ID: 20152669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.
Hodges-Simeon CR; Albert G; Richardson GB; McHale TS; Weinberg SM; Gurven M; Gaulin SJC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0240284. PubMed ID: 33711068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of sex and age on facial shape directional asymmetry in adults: A 3D landmarks-based method study.
Harnádková K; Kočandrlová K; Kožejová Jaklová L; Dupej J; Velemínská J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0288702. PubMed ID: 37535545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry.
Taylor HO; Morrison CS; Linden O; Phillips B; Chang J; Byrne ME; Sullivan SR; Forrest CR
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 24406564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved facial outcome assessment using a 3D anthropometric mask.
Claes P; Walters M; Clement J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 41(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 22103995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open-Source Tools for Dense Facial Tissue Depth Mapping of Computed Tomography Models.
Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Falsetti C; Falsetti AB; Ehrhardt CJ
Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 30387384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging.
Patel A; Islam SM; Murray K; Goonewardene MS
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():36. PubMed ID: 26490376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Three-dimensional Analysis of Zygomatic Symmetry in Normal, Uninjured Faces.
Belcastro A; Willing R; Jenkyn T; Johnson M; Galil K; Yazdani A
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 26967083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
