146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21740502)
1. In young adults with a low body mass index ultrasonography is sufficient as a diagnostic tool for ureteric stones.
Pichler R; Skradski V; Aigner F; Leonhartsberger N; Steiner H
BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(5):770-4. PubMed ID: 21740502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.
Coll DM; Varanelli MJ; Smith RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 11756098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stone-targeted dual-energy CT: a new diagnostic approach to urinary calculosis.
Ascenti G; Siragusa C; Racchiusa S; Ielo I; Privitera G; Midili F; Mazziotti S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Oct; 195(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 20858824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining the efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of ureteral stone.
Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
Urology; 2014 Sep; 84(3):533-7. PubMed ID: 25168527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic.
Patlas M; Farkas A; Fisher D; Zaghal I; Hadas-Halpern I
Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):901-4. PubMed ID: 11675305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is bilateral ureterorenoscopy the first choice for the treatment of bilateral ureteral stones? An updated study.
Gunlusoy B; Degirmenci T; Arslan M; Kozacıoglu Z; Koras O; Ceylan Y; Ors B
Urol Int; 2012; 89(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 23128066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of digital abdominal radiography for the detection of ureter stones by stone size and location.
Jung SI; Kim YJ; Park HS; Jeon HJ; Park HK; Paick SH; Kim HG; Lho YS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):879-82. PubMed ID: 21084904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the potential of combined B-mode features and color Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of ureteric stone as an alternative to ionizing radiation exposure by computed tomography.
Abdel Gawad AM; Moustafa BA; Abouelgreed TA; Elnady EA; Khater S; Rehan M; Elebiary MF; Fathy BA; Shaalan A; Ramadan N; Hindawy M; Abdelkader SF
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2024 Jun; 96(2):12523. PubMed ID: 38934522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.
Neisius A; Wöllner J; Thomas C; Roos FC; Brenner W; Hampel C; Preminger GM; Thüroff JW; Gillitzer R
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):972-81. PubMed ID: 24118958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.
Ray AA; Ghiculete D; Pace KT; Honey RJ
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 20206970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Zanetti G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The meaning and usefulness of spiral CT for radiolucent ureteric stones diagnosis: our experience].
Passavanti G; Pizzuti V; Costantini FM; Bragaglia A; Franci L; Paolini R
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Mar; 75(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 12741346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT.
Smith RC; Verga M; McCarthy S; Rosenfield AT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 8571915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography for ureteral stones in emergency department patients.
Moore CL; Daniels B; Ghita M; Gunabushanam G; Luty S; Molinaro AM; Singh D; Gross CP
Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Feb; 65(2):189-98.e2. PubMed ID: 25441242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of intracorporeal lithotripsy of upper tract stones is not affected by BMI and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) in obese and morbid patients.
Pompeo A; Molina WR; Juliano C; Sehrt D; Kim FJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):702-9; discussion 710-1. PubMed ID: 24267113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic variables for shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment success: no impact of body mass index (BMI) using a third generation lithotripter.
Hatiboglu G; Popeneciu V; Kurosch M; Huber J; Pahernik S; Pfitzenmaier J; Haferkamp A; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(7):1192-7. PubMed ID: 21342413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: comparative study of stone depth in kidney and ureter treatments.
Robert M; A'Ch S; Lanfrey P; Guiter J; Navratil H
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 10646673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
