131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21741192)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine with axial loading: a review of 120 cases.
Kinder A; Filho FP; Ribeiro E; Domingues RC; Domingues RC; Marchiori E; Gasparetto E
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e561-4. PubMed ID: 21741192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic advancement of axial loaded lumbar spine MRI in patients with clinically suspected central spinal canal stenosis.
Kim YK; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Yeom JS; Kang HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):E1342-7. PubMed ID: 23797506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Axial loading MRI of the lumbar spine.
Manenti G; Liccardo G; Sergiacomi G; Ferrante L; D'Andrea G; Konda D; Fraioli B; Schillaci O; Simonetti G; Masala S
In Vivo; 2003; 17(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 14598603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical results in hidden lumbar spinal stenosis detected by axial loaded computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: an outcome study.
Willén J; Wessberg PJ; Danielsson B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):E109-15. PubMed ID: 18277859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Kusakabe T; Ishii Y; Itoi E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 21301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting dynamic foraminal stenosis in the lumbar spine.
Singh V; Montgomery SR; Aghdasi B; Inoue H; Wang JC; Daubs MD
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23669126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals.
Danielson B; Willén J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(23):2601-6. PubMed ID: 11725242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic effects of axial loading on the lumbar spine during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected spinal stenosis.
Wang YC; Jeng CM; Wu CY; Chang HY; Huang YC; Wang YJ; Wang PC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2008 Apr; 107(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 18445548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The diagnostic effect from axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with degenerative disorders.
Willén J; Danielson B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(23):2607-14. PubMed ID: 11725243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dural sac cross-sectional area does not correlate with efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in single level lumbar spinal stenosis.
Park CH; Lee SH; Jung JY
Pain Physician; 2011; 14(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21785481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: diagnosis with axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging.
Jayakumar P; Nnadi C; Saifuddin A; Macsweeney E; Casey A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(10):E298-301. PubMed ID: 16648736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.
Ferrara L; Triano JJ; Sohn MJ; Song E; Lee DD
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16153584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
Carlisle E; Luna M; Tsou PM; Wang JC
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: findings in female subjects from administrative and nursing professions.
Schenk P; Läubli T; Hodler J; Klipstein A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):2701-6. PubMed ID: 17077739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of lumbar high intensity zone on axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging.
Saifuddin A; McSweeney E; Lehovsky J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(21):E449-51; discussion E451-2. PubMed ID: 14595173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of MR imaging in the evaluation of low back pain (orthopedic surgeon's view).
Taneichi H
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2001 Jun; 5(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 11510457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
