176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21741470)
21. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Statistical analysis of microarray data: a Bayesian approach.
Gottardo R; Pannucci JA; Kuske CR; Brettin T
Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):597-620. PubMed ID: 14557114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4263-71. PubMed ID: 16204346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How accurately can we control the FDR in analyzing microarray data?
Jung SH; Jang W
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1730-6. PubMed ID: 16644791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD; Xu H
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Identification of differentially expressed genes using multi-resolution wavelet transformation analysis combined with SAM.
Wu Y; Zhang L; Liu L; Zhang Y; Yi D
Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 22906473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving cluster-based missing value estimation of DNA microarray data.
Brás LP; Menezes JC
Biomol Eng; 2007 Jun; 24(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 17493870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis.
Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Integration of statistical inference methods and a novel control measure to improve sensitivity and specificity of data analysis in expression profiling studies.
Zang S; Guo R; Zhang L; Lu Y
J Biomed Inform; 2007 Oct; 40(5):552-60. PubMed ID: 17317331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ranking analysis for identifying differentially expressed genes.
Qi Y; Sun H; Sun Q; Pan L
Genomics; 2011 May; 97(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 21402142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detecting differential expression in microarray data: comparison of optimal procedures.
Perelman E; Ploner A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17257426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Not proper ROC curves as new tool for the analysis of differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Parodi S; Pistoia V; Muselli M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():410. PubMed ID: 18834513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of oligonucleotide array experiments with repeated measures using mixed models.
Li H; Wood CL; Getchell TV; Getchell ML; Stromberg AJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 5():209. PubMed ID: 15626348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. High throughput screening of co-expressed gene pairs with controlled false discovery rate (FDR) and minimum acceptable strength (MAS).
Zhu D; Hero AO; Qin ZS; Swaroop A
J Comput Biol; 2005 Sep; 12(7):1029-45. PubMed ID: 16201920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Regularized ROC method for disease classification and biomarker selection with microarray data.
Ma S; Huang J
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(24):4356-62. PubMed ID: 16234316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
