These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21741748)
1. Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Yoon BS; Park H; Seong SJ; Park CT; Jun HS; Kim IH Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):190-3. PubMed ID: 21741748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-port laparoscopic salpingectomy for surgical treatment of tubal pregnancy: comparison with multi-port laparoscopic salpingectomy. Kim YW; Park BJ; Kim TE; Ro DY Int J Med Sci; 2013; 10(8):1073-8. PubMed ID: 23801896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-port laparoscopic salpingectomy for the surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Yoon BS; Park H; Seong SJ; Park CT; Park SW; Lee KJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 19926346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: prospective randomized trial using endoloop versus electrocautery. Lim YH; Ng SP; Ng PH; Tan AE; Jamil MA J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Dec; 33(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 18001454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of single-port and three-port laparoscopic salpingectomy in the management for tubal pregnancy. Sun HD; Horng HC; Liu CH; Hsiao SM; Chen YJ; Chang WH; Wang PH J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 May; 81(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 29233482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-trocar salpingectomy for the treatment of tubal pregnancy: a 'marionette-like' technique. Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Fasola M; Bolis P BJOG; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1417-9. PubMed ID: 16167947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is serum human chorionic gonadotrophin follow-up necessary after suspected spillage of trophoblast at the time of laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy? Bora SA; Kirk E; Daemen A; Timmerman D; Bourne T Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 71(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 21160149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and feasibility of a single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery during pregnancy. Lee JH; Lee JR; Jee BC; Suh CS; Kim SH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):864-70. PubMed ID: 23850362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison study of single-port (Octoport™) and four-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Wang T; Chong GO; Park NY; Hong DG; Lee YS Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 22261467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Kim SJ; Ryu GO; Choi BJ; Kim JG; Lee KJ; Lee SC; Oh ST Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):933-40. PubMed ID: 22107740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology with conventional laparoscopic instruments]. de Poncheville L; Smirnoff A; Ménard J; Corbineau G; Vié-Buret V; Nohra O; Leyre S; Drapier E Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Dec; 40(12):729-33. PubMed ID: 23165226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoendoscopic single-site salpingectomy in isthmic and ampullary ectopic pregnancy: preliminary report and technique. Bedaiwy MA; Escobar PF; Pinkerton J; Hurd W J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21354069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Yim GW; Jung YW; Paek J; Lee SH; Kwon HY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim JH; Kim YT; Kim SW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 203(1):26.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20417481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fertility outcomes subsequent to treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy in younger Turkish women. Turan V J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 24(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 21715197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-port versus needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Hosogi H; Strassel V; Martin C; Sakai Y; Saad S Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 Aug; 4(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 22776275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy. Lezoche E; Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; D'Ambrosio G Minerva Chir; 2003 Aug; 58(4):491-502, 502-7. PubMed ID: 14603161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study of 95 patients. Chen L; Zhu D; Wu Q; Yu Y Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():59-63. PubMed ID: 28951291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy management of tubal pregnancy. Saleh AM; Mahjoub MM; El-Kurdy AM Saudi Med J; 2001 Sep; 22(9):771-5. PubMed ID: 11590450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery. Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]