BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21741870)

  • 1. Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.
    Habibzadeh MA; Ay MR; Asl AR; Ghadiri H; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2012 Jul; 28(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 21741870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.
    Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Reijonen V; Kortesniemi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 24951205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise.
    Toth T; Ge Z; Daly MP
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3093-101. PubMed ID: 17822016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
    Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of head size∕shape, miscentering, and bowtie filter on peak patient tissue doses from modern brain perfusion 256-slice CT: how can we minimize the risk for deterministic effects?
    Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011911. PubMed ID: 23298102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of appropriate conversion factors for calculating size-specific dose estimates based on X-ray CT scout images after miscentering correction.
    Terashima M; Mizonobe K; Date H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Sep; 12(3):283-289. PubMed ID: 31222561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
    Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study.
    Marsh RM; Silosky MS
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 28133763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-size-dependent radiation dose optimisation technique for abdominal CT examinations.
    Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21357583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality.
    Goldman LW
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):213-25; quiz 226-8. PubMed ID: 18006597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic noise in CT detectors: Impact on image noise and artifacts.
    Duan X; Wang J; Leng S; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Grant K; Flohr T; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W626-32. PubMed ID: 24059402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic patient centering for MDCT: effect on radiation dose.
    Li J; Udayasankar UK; Toth TL; Seamans J; Small WC; Kalra MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):547-52. PubMed ID: 17242267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical Off-Centering in Reduced Dose Chest-CT: Impact on Effective Dose and Image Noise Values.
    Eberhard M; Blüthgen C; Barth BK; Frauenfelder T; Saltybaeva N; Martini K
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):508-517. PubMed ID: 31358357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image noise and radiation dose using an automatic tube current modulation technique at 64-detector computed tomography: effect of off-center patient position, bowtie filter type, and scan projection radiograph.
    Funama Y; Taguchi K; Awai K; Sakabe D; Shimamura M; Yamashita Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 19940670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.