142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21741870)
21. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner.
Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of image noise levels, scout scan dose and lens shield on image quality and radiation exposure in z-axis dose-modulated neck MSCT on 16- and 64-slice Toshiba Aquilion scanners.
Bauknecht HC; Jach C; Bohner G; Meyer H; Scheurig C; Siebert E; Klingebiel R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 19135816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dual-source CT angiography in aortic stent grafting: An in vitro aorta phantom study of image noise and radiation dose.
Sun Z; Ng C
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):884-93. PubMed ID: 20447840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT.
Paul J; Schell B; Kerl JM; Maentele W; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e128-32. PubMed ID: 21640536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. X-ray beam filtration, dosimetry phantom size and CT patient dose conversion factors.
Huda W; Sterzik A; Tipnis S
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):551-61. PubMed ID: 20023330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How patient off-centering impacts organ dose and image noise in pediatric head and thoracoabdominal CT.
Euler A; Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6790-6793. PubMed ID: 31278575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of mis-centering on radiation dose during CT head examination: A phantom study.
Isa INC; Rahmat SMS; Dom SM; Kayun Z; Karim MKA
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(4):631-639. PubMed ID: 31205011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The impact of x-ray tube stabilization on localized radiation dose in axial CT scans: initial results in CTDI phantoms.
Mathieu KB; McNitt-Gray MF; Cody DD
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(20):7363-7376. PubMed ID: 27694696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. CT dosimetry considerations in non typical conditions: the effect of scan field of view and table height selection.
Tsalafoutas IA; Georgolopoulou P; Abatzoglou I
Phys Med; 2012 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 21454113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Increased Computed Tomography Dose Due to Miscentering With Use of Automated Tube Voltage Selection: Phantom and Patient Study.
Filev PD; Mittal PK; Tang X; Duong PA; Wang X; Small WC; Applegate K; Moreno CC
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 26810714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preliminary studies for a CBCT imaging protocol for offline organ motion analysis: registration software validation and CTDI measurements.
Falco MD; Fontanarosa D; Miceli R; Carosi A; Santoni R; D'Andrea M
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 20363613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Brenot J; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; Savignoni A; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):1871-92. PubMed ID: 19265204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of miscentering and low-dose protocols on contrast resolution in computed tomography head examination.
Shaffiq Said Rahmat SM; Abdul Karim MK; Che Isa IN; Abd Rahman MA; Noor NM; Hoong NK
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Aug; 123():103840. PubMed ID: 32658782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variation in CT Number and Image Noise Uniformity According to Patient Positioning in MDCT.
Szczykutowicz TP; DuPlissis A; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1064-1072. PubMed ID: 28267350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of weighted CTDI in estimating average dose delivered to CTDI phantoms: An experimental study.
Treb K; Li K
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6484-6499. PubMed ID: 33034041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Relationships between patient size, dose and image noise under automatic tube current modulation systems.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ; Lopez-Gonzalez MR
J Radiol Prot; 2014 Mar; 34(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 24334678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
