These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21742045)

  • 1. Elemental and non-elemental olfactory learning in Drosophila.
    Young JM; Wessnitzer J; Armstrong JD; Webb B
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2011 Sep; 96(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 21742045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fruit flies can learn non-elemental olfactory discriminations.
    Durrieu M; Wystrach A; Arrufat P; Giurfa M; Isabel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Nov; 287(1938):20201234. PubMed ID: 33171086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of similarity between elemental stimuli and compounds in olfactory patterning discriminations.
    Deisig N; Lachnit H; Giurfa M
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 12074999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-elemental processing in olfactory discrimination tasks needs bilateral input in honeybees.
    Komischke B; Sandoz JC; Lachnit H; Giurfa M
    Behav Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 145(1-2):135-43. PubMed ID: 14529812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associative learning: Hebbian flies.
    Glanzman DL
    Curr Biol; 2005 Jun; 15(11):R416-9. PubMed ID: 15936261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An olfactory biconditional discrimination in the mouse.
    Dreumont-Boudreau SE; Dingle RN; Alcolado GM; LoLordo VM
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Mar; 87(3):634-40. PubMed ID: 16483617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative patterning is easier than a biconditional discrimination.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ; Gharaei S; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Oct; 34(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 18954233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of using stimuli from three different dimensions on autoshaping with a complex negative patterning discrimination.
    Pearce JM; George DN
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Oct; 55(4):349-64. PubMed ID: 12350286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
    Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination: from behaviour to brain.
    Phillmore LS
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):285-97. PubMed ID: 18096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Olfactory discrimination ability and brain expression of c-fos, Gir and Glut1 mRNA are altered in n-3 fatty acid-depleted rats.
    Hichami A; Datiche F; Ullah S; Liénard F; Chardigny JM; Cattarelli M; Khan NA
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 184(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17686536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Olfactory learning and behaviour are 'insulated' against visual processing in larval Drosophila.
    Yarali A; Hendel T; Gerber B
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2006 Oct; 192(10):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16830136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the unique cue in configural discriminations.
    Rescorla RA; Grau JW; Durlach PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Jul; 11(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 4009124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Summation effects in human learning: evidence from patterning discriminations in goal-tracking.
    Thorwart A; Uengoer M; Livesey EJ; Harris JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1366-1379. PubMed ID: 27126385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction between age and perceptual similarity in olfactory discrimination learning in F344 rats: relationships with spatial learning.
    Yoder WM; Gaynor LS; Burke SN; Setlow B; Smith DW; Bizon JL
    Neurobiol Aging; 2017 May; 53():122-137. PubMed ID: 28259065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Configural learning without configural training.
    Healey AN; Gaffan EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Oct; 27(4):373-93. PubMed ID: 11676087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A positive patterning advantage with complex but not simple patterning: a cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2118-34. PubMed ID: 23506406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.