These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
615 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21742372)
1. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device. Dillon PA; Foglia RP J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Sep; 41(9):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16952595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy. Ng F; Mastoroudes H; Paul E; Davies N; Tibballs J; Hochhauser D; Mayer A; Begent R; Meyer T Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2007 Sep; 19(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 17517500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients. Gleeson NC; Fiorica JV; Mark JE; Pinelli DM; Hoffman MS; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 8112648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Cohn DE; Mutch DG; Rader JS; Farrell M; Awantang R; Herzog TJ Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population. Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients. Koonings PP; Given FT J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peripheral infusion ports for central venous access in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Cunningham MJ; Collins MB; Kredentser DC; Malfetano JH Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):397-9. PubMed ID: 8774645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device. Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The mechanisms of failure of totally implantable central venous access system: analysis of 73 cases with fracture of catheter. Lin CH; Wu HS; Chan DC; Hsieh CB; Huang MH; Yu JC Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 36(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 19709847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with the intravenous totally implanted port in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Nelson BE; Mayer AR; Tseng PC; Schwartz PE Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 8175028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of Groshong central venous catheters on a gynecologic oncology service. Holloway RW; Orr JW Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Feb; 56(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 7896188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques]. Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A peripherally implanted permanent central venous access device. Morris P; Buller R; Kendall S; Anderson B Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 78(6):1138-42. PubMed ID: 1945224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implantable subcutaneous venous access devices: is port fixation necessary? A review of 534 cases. McNulty NJ; Perrich KD; Silas AM; Linville RM; Forauer AR Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Aug; 33(4):751-5. PubMed ID: 19957181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports]. Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients. Bessoud B; de Baere T; Kuoch V; Desruennes E; Cosset MF; Lassau N; Roche A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 12540466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience. Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques. Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgically implanted subcutaneous venous access devices in cancer patients. Repelaer van Driel OJ; Kuin CM; van de Velde CJ Neth J Surg; 1988 Jun; 40(4):97-9. PubMed ID: 3217033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]