103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21742416)
1. [Complications and nerve preservation in prostatectomy according to the time interval from diagnostic biopsy].
Martín-López JE; Carlos-Gil AM; Beltrán-Calvo C; Rodríguez-López R; Romero-Tabares A
Actas Urol Esp; 2012 Mar; 36(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 21742416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radical prostatectomy shortly after prostate biopsy does not affect operative difficulty or efficacy.
Eggener SE; Yossepowitch O; Serio AM; Vickers AJ; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1128-33. PubMed ID: 17572200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program.
Varkarakis J; Pinggera GM; Sebe P; Berger A; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 14972485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in 2013.
Ali A; Nguyen DP; Tewari A
Minerva Chir; 2013 Oct; 68(5):499-512. PubMed ID: 24101007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of multiple biopsies on outcomes of nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Sooriakumaran P; Calaway A; Sagalovich D; Roy S; Srivastava A; Joneja J; Shevchuk M; Tewari AK
Int J Impot Res; 2012; 24(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 22534563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Melamud O; Ahlering TE
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on perioperative outcomes.
Martin GL; Nunez RN; Humphreys MD; Martin AD; Ferrigni RG; Andrews PE; Castle EP
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1734-7. PubMed ID: 19549123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Urinary and sexual quality of life 1 year following robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov SA; Eng MK; Bernstein AJ; Katz M; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):663-7. PubMed ID: 18554650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].
Jakse G; Brehmer B; Borchers H; Verger-Kuhnke A; Biesterfeld S
Urologe A; 2003 Mar; 42(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 12671772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy.
Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y
Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Montorsi F; Salonia A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zanni G; Briganti A; Deho' F; Naspro R; Farina E; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 16257111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy affect the immediate postoperative outcome?
Lee DK; Allareddy V; O'donnell MA; Williams RD; Konety BR
BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 16336327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy in preoperatively high-risk patients is safe and efficacious.
Lavery HJ; Nabizada-Pace F; Carlucci JR; Brajtbord JS; Samadi DB
Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 20189844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rabbani F; Yunis LH; Pinochet R; Nogueira L; Vora KC; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B; Laudone V; Scardino PT; Touijer K
Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):371-86. PubMed ID: 19945779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy and lymph node excision in prostate carcinoma].
Heidenreich A; Hammerer P
Aktuelle Urol; 2013 May; 44(3):223-42. PubMed ID: 23716024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Erectile dysfunction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Orvieto MA; Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Mathe M; Palmer K; Patel VR
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 May; 10(5):747-54. PubMed ID: 20470006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerve sparing can preserve orgasmic function in most men after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Tewari A; Grover S; Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Rao S; Gupta A; Gray R; Leung R; Paduch DA
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 21851544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
