These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21743073)

  • 21. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
    Schuncke A; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
    Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Low-dose digital roentgenography of the thoracic cavity: comparative evaluation of the method].
    Kitaev VM; Belova IB
    Voen Med Zh; 2003 Mar; 324(3):47-54. PubMed ID: 12722513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
    Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment.
    Båth M; Håkansson M; Hansson J; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):230-5. PubMed ID: 15933113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dose and perceived image quality in chest radiography.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Geleijns J
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19577393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of input grey values and contrast profiles: a contribution to the discussion on optimization of evaluation parameters in storage phosphorus radiography].
    Schätzl M; Fink U
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 7881084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs.
    Sensakovic WF; O'Dell MC; Letter H; Kohler N; Rop B; Cook J; Logsdon G; Varich L
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1606-13. PubMed ID: 27488507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Effect of digital radiography processing parameters on digital chest radiograph for occupational exposed workers].
    Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Yuan HS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 May; 31(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 23803524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Enhancement and compression of digital chest radiographs.
    Cohn M; Trefler M; Young TY
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 2299708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Absorbed dose and image quality in examinations of the colon with digital and analogue techniques.
    Persliden J; Larsson P; Norén B; Wirell S
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Nov; 38(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 9394659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Eriksson F; Medin J; Besjakov J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Sandborg M; Almén A; Lanhede B; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 15933082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital chest radiography image quality assessment with dose reduction.
    Grewal RK; Young N; Colins L; Karunnaratne N; Sabharwal N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Mar; 35(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22302464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Application of off-line image processing for optimization in chest computed radiography using a low cost system.
    Muhogora WE; Msaki P; Padovani R
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):4774. PubMed ID: 26103165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality in digital chest radiography by new spatial noise reduction algorithm.
    Lee W; Lee S; Chong S; Lee K; Lee J; Choi JC; Lim C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228609. PubMed ID: 32084154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.