BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21744349)

  • 1. Quantitative comparison of surgical margin histology following excision with traditional electrosurgery and a low-thermal-injury dissection device.
    Ruidiaz ME; Cortes-Mateos MJ; Sandoval S; Martin DT; Wang-Rodriguez J; Hasteh F; Wallace A; Vose JG; Kummel AC; Blair SL
    J Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 104(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 21744349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.
    Caughran JL; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Dekhne NS; Benitez PR; Goldstein NS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3020-7. PubMed ID: 19636632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies.
    Jenkinson AD; Al-Mufti RA; Mohsen Y; Berry MJ; Wells C; Carpenter R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2001 Feb; 27(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11237487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
    Smitt MC; Horst K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
    Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
    Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of margin assessment by radial and shave sections in wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma of the breast.
    Hodi Z; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Pinder SE; Donovan G; Macmillan RD; Lee AH
    Histopathology; 2010 Apr; 56(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 20459567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between initial margin status for invasive breast cancer and residual carcinoma after re-excision.
    Kotwall C; Ranson M; Stiles A; Hamann MS
    Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 17439024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
    Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
    Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A two-millimetre free margin from invasive tumour minimises residual disease in breast-conserving surgery.
    Ward ST; Jones BG; Jewkes AJ
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 20946273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Histological margin and residual disease assessment for breast carcinoma].
    Sigal-Zafrani B; Fourquet A; Vincent-Salomon A; Fréneaux P; Génin P; Rosty C; Sastre-Garau X
    Cancer Radiother; 2003 Nov; 7 Suppl 1():120s-123s. PubMed ID: 15124553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens.
    Guidi AJ; Connolly JL; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
    Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 9118040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
    Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer.
    Keskek M; Kothari M; Ardehali B; Betambeau N; Nasiri N; Gui GP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 15522551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
    Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery.
    Cellini C; Huston TL; Martins D; Christos P; Carson J; Kemper S; Simmons RM
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jun; 189(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 15910716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma.
    Gupta A; Subhas G; Dubay L; Silapaswan S; Kolachalam R; Kestenberg W; Ferguson L; Jacobs MJ; Gorieil Y; Mittal VK
    Am Surg; 2010 Jul; 76(7):731-4. PubMed ID: 20698380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with ipsilateral breast failure and distant metastases in patients with invasive breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy. A clinicopathologic study of 607 neoplasms from 583 patients.
    Goldstein NS; Kestin L; Vicini F
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Oct; 120(4):500-27. PubMed ID: 14560562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
    Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.