These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21744379)

  • 1. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
    Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
    Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
    Crocker CB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
    Pickel KL
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mock juror sensitivity to forensic evidence in drug facilitated sexual assaults.
    Schuller RA; Ryan A; Krauss D; Jenkins G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23433947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
    Louden JE; Skeem JL
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
    Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
    Cooper J; Hall J
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
    McCabe DP; Castel AD; Rhodes MG
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 21751243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting the insanity defense: contested or consensus?
    Cirincione C
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 8807157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
    Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom.
    Plumm KM; Terrance CA
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confessions and expert testimony.
    Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 14974801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.
    Beck JC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 8054675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.