These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21744808)

  • 21. Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies.
    Flores-Alsina X; Corominas L; Snip L; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):4700-10. PubMed ID: 21851960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Alternatives for upgrading the Wilderness Wastewater Treatment Plant for biological nutrient removal.
    Cokgor EU; Randall CW
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):453-62. PubMed ID: 14753568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Seeking a way to promote the use of constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment in developing countries.
    Zurita F; Belmont MA; De Anda J; White JR
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):654-9. PubMed ID: 21330710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The efficiency of biological aerobic treatment of piggery wastewater to control nitrogen, phosphorus, pathogen and gas emissions.
    Béline F; Daumer ML; Loyon L; Pourcher AM; Dabert P; Guiziou F; Peu P
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1909-14. PubMed ID: 18587177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. WEF/WERF study of BNR plants achieving very low N and P limits: evaluation of technology performance and process reliability.
    Bott CB; Parker DS; Jimenez J; Miller MW; Neethling JB
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):808-15. PubMed ID: 22339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling nitrogen removal for a denitrification biofilter.
    Samie G; Bernier J; Rocher V; Lessard P
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2011 Aug; 34(6):747-55. PubMed ID: 21340676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of separate urine collection on wastewater treatment systems.
    Wilsenach J; van Loosdrecht M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 12926626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nitrogen speciation in wastewater treatment plant influents and effluents-the US and Polish case studies.
    Pagilla KR; Urgun-Demirtas M; Czerwionka K; Makinia J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1511-7. PubMed ID: 18520006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Upgrading the Sjölunda WWTP according to a novel process concept.
    Hanner N; Aspegren H; Nyberg U; Andersson B
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 12926663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of strategies for sanitation management in wastewater treatment plants in order to control/reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
    Préndez M; Lara-González S
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):658-64. PubMed ID: 17548144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nitrogen reduction in wastewater treatment using different anox-circulation flow rates and ethanol as a carbon source.
    Poutiainen H; Laitinen S; Pradhan S; Pessi M; Heinonen-Tanski H
    Environ Technol; 2010 May; 31(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 20540423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
    Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. N(2)O production during nitrogen removal via nitrite from domestic wastewater: main sources and control method.
    Yang Q; Liu X; Peng C; Wang S; Sun H; Peng Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9400-6. PubMed ID: 20000535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of membrane solid-liquid separation on design of biological nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
    Ramphao M; Wentzel MC; Merritt R; Ekama GA; Young T; Buckley CA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(6):630-46. PubMed ID: 15696540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The solids retention time-a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants.
    Clara M; Kreuzinger N; Strenn B; Gans O; Kroiss H
    Water Res; 2005 Jan; 39(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 15607169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of COD/N ratio on nitrous oxide emission from microcosm wetlands and their performance in removing nitrogen from wastewater.
    Wu J; Zhang J; Jia W; Xie H; Gu RR; Li C; Gao B
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jun; 100(12):2910-7. PubMed ID: 19268576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anaerobic digestion: impact of future greenhouse gases mitigation policies on methane generation and usage.
    Greenfield PF; Batstone DJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):39-47. PubMed ID: 16180407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nutrient removal from wastewaters using high performance materials.
    Mackinnon ID; Barr K; Miller E; Hunter S; Pinel T
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):101-7. PubMed ID: 12906277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Life cycle assessment of vertical and horizontal flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment considering nitrogen and carbon greenhouse gas emissions.
    Fuchs VJ; Mihelcic JR; Gierke JS
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(5):2073-81. PubMed ID: 21257188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Model analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of sewage sludge treatment systems with different processes and scales.
    Soda S; Iwai Y; Sei K; Shimod Y; Ike M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 20107263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.