1229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21745326)
1. Seven-year follow-up results of TiUnite implants supporting mandibular overdentures: early versus delayed loading.
Turkyilmaz I; Tozum TF; Fuhrmann DM; Tumer C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e83-90. PubMed ID: 21745326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 2-year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading.
Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C; Ozbek EN
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 17209784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early versus delayed loading of mandibular implant-supported overdentures: 5-year results.
Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e39-46. PubMed ID: 19673922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading.
Assad AS; Hassan SA; Shawky YM; Badawy MM
Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17563512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal Bone Response Around Immediate- and Delayed-Loading Implants Supporting a Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Schincaglia GP; Rubin S; Thacker S; Dhingra A; Trombelli L; Ioannidou E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):448-58. PubMed ID: 27004292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timing of loading--immediate, early, or delayed--in the outcome of implants in the edentulous mandible: a prospective clinical trial.
De Smet E; Duyck J; Vander Sloten J; Jacobs R; Naert I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):580-94. PubMed ID: 17929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol.
Stoker GT; Wismeijer D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 19681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implants.
Turkyilmaz I
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16489951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes.
Ma S; Tawse-Smith A; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 20617220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted direct laser metal-forming implants: results from a 1-year prospective study.
Mangano C; Mangano FG; Shibli JA; Ricci M; Perrotti V; d'Avila S; Piattelli A
J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 21627459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early loading of unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures using a one-stage operative procedure with two different implant systems: a 2-year report.
Tawse-Smith A; Payne AG; Kumara R; Thomson WM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 11938636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of edentulism using Astra Tech implants and ball abutments to retain mandibular overdentures.
Cooper LF; Scurria MS; Lang LA; Guckes AD; Moriarty JD; Felton DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):646-53. PubMed ID: 10531736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Tumer C; Yenigul M; Avci M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 16958688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional and early loading of unsplinted ITI implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
Payne AG; Tawse-Smith A; Duncan WD; Kumara R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 12519334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate loading of two implants supporting a magnet attachment-retained overdenture: one-year clinical study.
Pae A; Kim JW; Kwon KR
Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):428-36. PubMed ID: 20881814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate loading of two freestanding implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: 1-year pilot prospective study.
Liao KY; Kan JY; Rungcharassaeng K; Lozada JL; Herford AS; Goodacre CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 20657875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal bone resorption around immediate and delayed loaded implants supporting a locator-retained mandibular overdenture. A 1-year randomised controlled trial.
Elsyad MA; Elsaih EA; Khairallah AS
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Aug; 41(8):608-18. PubMed ID: 24814408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
