These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21747286)

  • 41. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Estimating population-averaged hazard ratios in the presence of unmeasured confounding.
    Martínez-Camblor P; MacKenzie TA; O'Malley AJ
    Int J Biostat; 2023 May; 19(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 35320637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Model specification and unmeasured confounders in partially ecologic analyses based on group proportions of exposed.
    Björk J; Strömberg U
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2005 Jun; 31(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 15999570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of Confounding and Selection Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.
    Schubauer-Berigan MK; Berrington de Gonzalez A; Cardis E; Laurier D; Lubin JH; Hauptmann M; Richardson DB
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2020 Jul; 2020(56):133-153. PubMed ID: 32657349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
    Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EE; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 184(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 27416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of Berkson measurement error on parameter estimates in Cox regression models.
    Küchenhoff H; Bender R; Langner I
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Jun; 13(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 17401682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Confounding adjustment performance of ordinal analysis methods in stroke studies.
    Zonneveld TP; Aigner A; Groenwold RHH; Algra A; Nederkoorn PJ; Grittner U; Kruyt ND; Siegerink B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231670. PubMed ID: 32298347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An Assessment of the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model for Epidemiologic Studies.
    Moolgavkar SH; Chang ET; Watson HN; Lau EC
    Risk Anal; 2018 Apr; 38(4):777-794. PubMed ID: 29168991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Time scale and adjusted survival curves for marginal structural cox models.
    Westreich D; Cole SR; Tien PC; Chmiel JS; Kingsley L; Funk MJ; Anastos K; Jacobson LP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 171(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 20139124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Healthy Worker Survivor Effect: Target Parameters and Target Populations.
    Brown DM; Picciotto S; Costello S; Neophytou AM; Izano MA; Ferguson JM; Eisen EA
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2017 Sep; 4(3):364-372. PubMed ID: 28712046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Risk patterns in drug safety study using relative times by accelerated failure time models when proportional hazards assumption is questionable: an illustrative case study of cancer risk of patients on glucose-lowering therapies.
    Ng ES; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH; van Staa TP
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(5):382-94. PubMed ID: 26123413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Statistical Methods for Modeling Time-Updated Exposures in Cohort Studies of Chronic Kidney Disease.
    Xie D; Yang W; Jepson C; Roy J; Hsu JY; Shou H; Anderson AH; Landis JR; Feldman HI;
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2017 Nov; 12(11):1892-1899. PubMed ID: 28818846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model.
    Klungsøyr O; Sexton J; Sandanger I; Nygård JF
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Jun; 15(2):278-94. PubMed ID: 19109770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Simulation from a known Cox MSM using standard parametric models for the g-formula.
    Young JG; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):1001-14. PubMed ID: 24151138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A Cautionary Note on Using Propensity Score Calibration to Control for Unmeasured Confounding Bias When the Surrogacy Assumption Is Absent.
    Wan F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(2):360-369. PubMed ID: 37759344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease mortality in railroad workers.
    Hart JE; Laden F; Eisen EA; Smith TJ; Garshick E
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Apr; 66(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 19039098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Adjusting for time-varying confounders in survival analysis using structural nested cumulative survival time models.
    Seaman S; Dukes O; Keogh R; Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):472-483. PubMed ID: 31562652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The impact of unmeasured baseline effect modification on estimates from an inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic model.
    Delaney JA; Platt RW; Suissa S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2009; 24(7):343-9. PubMed ID: 19418232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.