205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21748478)
1. Comparison of contracture, adhesion, tissue ingrowth, and histologic response characteristics of permanent and absorbable barrier meshes in a porcine model of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Deeken CR; Matthews BD
Hernia; 2012 Feb; 16(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 21748478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ventralight ST and SorbaFix versus Physiomesh and Securestrap in a porcine model.
Deeken CR; Matthews BD
JSLS; 2013; 17(4):549-59. PubMed ID: 24398196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic evaluation of absorbable and non-absorbable barrier coated mesh secured to the peritoneum with fibrin sealant in a New Zealand white rabbit model.
Jenkins ED; Melman L; Desai S; Deeken CR; Greco SC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
Hernia; 2011 Dec; 15(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 21607571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate/absorbable barrier composite mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Scott JR; Deeken CR; Martindale RG; Rosen MJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3691-701. PubMed ID: 27369286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of the composition, characteristics, and effectiveness of barrier mesh prostheses utilized for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Deeken CR; Faucher KM; Matthews BD
Surg Endosc; 2012 Feb; 26(2):566-75. PubMed ID: 21898010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraperitoneal behaviour of a new composite mesh (Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch) designed for umbilical or epigastric hernia repair.
García-Moreno F; Sotomayor S; Pérez-López P; Pérez-Köhler B; Bayon Y; Pascual G; Bellón JM
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3479-88. PubMed ID: 24969850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pore size and pore shape--but not mesh density--alter the mechanical strength of tissue ingrowth and host tissue response to synthetic mesh materials in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Lake SP; Ray S; Zihni AM; Thompson DM; Gluckstein J; Deeken CR
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():186-97. PubMed ID: 25486631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of adhesion characteristics to intraperitoneal mesh and adhesiolysis-related complications during laparoscopic re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Jenkins ED; Yom V; Melman L; Brunt LM; Eagon JC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 20445995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.
Schreinemacher MH; van Barneveld KW; Dikmans RE; Gijbels MJ; Greve JW; Bouvy ND
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4202-9. PubMed ID: 23749270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of intraperitoneal placement of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant in a New Zealand white rabbit model.
Jenkins ED; Melman L; Desai S; Brown SR; Frisella MM; Deeken CR; Matthews BD
Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):604-12. PubMed ID: 20652323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation.
Ditzel M; Deerenberg EB; Grotenhuis N; Harlaar JJ; Monkhorst K; Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM; Jeekel J; Lange JF
Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3654-62. PubMed ID: 23549771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model.
Duffy AJ; Hogle NJ; LaPerle KM; Fowler DL
Hernia; 2004 Dec; 8(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 15290611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy of absorbable and non-absorbable fixation systems for intraperitoneal mesh fixation: an experimental study in swine.
Kapoulas S; Papalois A; Papadakis G; Tsoulfas G; Christoforidis E; Papaziogas B; Schizas D; Chatzimavroudis G
Hernia; 2022 Apr; 26(2):567-579. PubMed ID: 33400026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tensile strength testing for resorbable mesh fixation systems in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Reynvoet E; Berrevoet F; De Somer F; Vercauteren G; Vanoverbeke I; Chiers K; Troisi R
Surg Endosc; 2012 Sep; 26(9):2513-20. PubMed ID: 22476828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical and Histological Characteristics of Phasix™ ST Mesh in a Porcine Model of Hernia Repair.
Deeken CR; Gagne DH; Badhwar A
J Invest Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(2):415-423. PubMed ID: 33044098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of absorbable and permanent mesh fixation devices: adhesion formation and mechanical strength.
Byrd JF; Agee N; Swan RZ; Lau KN; Heath JJ; Mckillop IH; Sindram D; Martinie JB; Iannitti DA
Hernia; 2011 Oct; 15(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 21594698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Deeken CR; Abdo MS; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1541-52. PubMed ID: 20976479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit.
Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT
J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mesh fixation using novel bio-adhesive coating compared to tack fixation for IPOM hernia repair: in vivo evaluation in a porcine model.
Ben Yehuda A; Nyska A; Szold A
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2364-2375. PubMed ID: 31069501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of Vicryl mesh in a porcine model to assess its safety as an adjunct to posterior fascial closure during retromuscular mesh placement.
Liu L; Petro C; Majumder A; Fayezizadeh M; Anderson J; Novitsky YW
Hernia; 2016 Apr; 20(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 26886013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
