205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21748478)
41. Intraperitoneal mesh devices for small midline hernias: mesh behavior in a porcine model.
Reynvoet E; Chiers K; Van Overbeke I; Troisi R; Berrevoet F
Hernia; 2015 Dec; 19(6):955-63. PubMed ID: 25791625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of mesh fixation devices for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: an experimental study on human anatomic specimens.
Chan YW; Sow Z; Lukic D; Monschein M; Calek E; Pretterklieber M; Hollinsky C
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3158-3163. PubMed ID: 29340814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Titanium versus absorbable tacks comparative study (TACS): a multicenter, non-inferiority prospective evaluation during laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.
Silecchia G; Cavallaro G; Raparelli L; Olmi S; Baldazzi G; Campanile FC
Trials; 2015 Jun; 16():249. PubMed ID: 26037907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Polyester-based mesh for ventral hernia repair: is it safe?
Rosen MJ
Am J Surg; 2009 Mar; 197(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 19245914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Adhesions and meshes: synthetic versus bioprosthetic.
Turza KC; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):206S-213S. PubMed ID: 23096974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cell-coating affects tissue integration of synthetic and biologic meshes: comparative analysis of the onlay and underlay mesh positioning in rats.
Majumder A; Gao Y; Sadava EE; Anderson JM; Novitsky YW
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4445-53. PubMed ID: 26895904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of resorbable polydioxanone and polyglycolic acid meshes in a rat model of ventral hernia repair.
Fatkhudinov T; Tsedik L; Arutyunyan I; Lokhonina A; Makarov A; Korshunov A; Elchaninov A; Kananykhina E; Vasyukova O; Usman N; Uvarova E; Chuprynin V; Eremina I; Degtyarev D; Sukhikh G
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Apr; 107(3):652-663. PubMed ID: 30091512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Burns NK; Jaffari MV; Rios CN; Mathur AB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jan; 125(1):167-176. PubMed ID: 19910855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L: -lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.
Fujino K; Kinoshita M; Saitoh A; Yano H; Nishikawa K; Fujie T; Iwaya K; Kakihara M; Takeoka S; Saitoh D; Tanaka Y
Surg Endosc; 2011 Oct; 25(10):3428-36. PubMed ID: 21638189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Adhesion Prevention Efficacy of Composite Meshes Parietex
Winny M; Maegel L; Grethe L; Lippmann T; Jonigk D; Schrem H; Kaltenborn A; Klempnauer J; Poehnert D
Int J Med Sci; 2016; 13(12):936-941. PubMed ID: 27994499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Butler CE; Prieto VG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 15277815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Tensile strength and adhesion formation of mesh fixation systems used in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.
Hollinsky C; Kolbe T; Walter I; Joachim A; Sandberg S; Koch T; Rülicke T; Tuchmann A
Surg Endosc; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1318-24. PubMed ID: 20033724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Relationship between tissue ingrowth and mesh contraction.
Gonzalez R; Fugate K; McClusky D; Ritter EM; Lederman A; Dillehay D; Smith CD; Ramshaw BJ
World J Surg; 2005 Aug; 29(8):1038-43. PubMed ID: 15977079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Development of better tolerated prosthetic materials: applications in gynecological surgery].
Debodinance P; Delporte P; Engrand JB; Boulogne M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 12407323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. 120-day comparative analysis of adhesion grade and quantity, mesh contraction, and tissue response to a novel omega-3 fatty acid bioabsorbable barrier macroporous mesh after intraperitoneal placement.
Pierce RA; Perrone JM; Nimeri A; Sexton JA; Walcutt J; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
Surg Innov; 2009 Mar; 16(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19124448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Real-time monitoring of the peritoneal behavior of composite prostheses by sequential laparoscopy: applicability in ventral hernia repair].
Bellón JM; Rodríguez M; García-Honduvilla N; Gómez-Gil V; Pascual G; Buján J
Cir Esp; 2007 Nov; 82(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 18021628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis.
Kaufmann R; Jairam AP; Mulder IM; Wu Z; Verhelst J; Vennix S; Giesen LJX; Clahsen-van Groningen MC; Jeekel J; Lange JF
Br J Surg; 2017 Dec; 104(13):1884-1893. PubMed ID: 28901533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pain and convalescence following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Eriksen JR
Dan Med Bull; 2011 Dec; 58(12):B4369. PubMed ID: 22142580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Silk fibroin hydrogel as physical barrier for prevention of post hernia adhesion.
Konar S; Guha R; Kundu B; Nandi S; Ghosh TK; Kundu SC; Konar A; Hazra S
Hernia; 2017 Feb; 21(1):125-137. PubMed ID: 27038052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic prostheses for abdominal hernia repair.
de Castro Brás LE; Shurey S; Sibbons PD
Hernia; 2012 Feb; 16(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 21805341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
