These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21749224)

  • 1. Enhanced processing fluency leads to biases in source memory.
    Kurilla BP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1609-31. PubMed ID: 21749224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluency effects in recognition memory: are perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency interchangeable?
    Lanska M; Olds JM; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24001021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 24016138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishing familiarity from fluency for the compound word pair effect in associative recognition.
    Ahmad FN; Hockley WE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1768-1791. PubMed ID: 27415965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing fluency of the forms and sounds of Chinese characters.
    Liu S; Zhang X; Ren Y; Yu Q
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 20621523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.
    Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):484-99. PubMed ID: 20192544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can fluency be interpreted as novelty? Retraining the interpretation of fluency in recognition memory.
    Olds JM; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):653-64. PubMed ID: 22250906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Source memory for unidentified stimuli.
    Kurilla BP; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):398-410. PubMed ID: 20192538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Embodied memory judgments: a case of motor fluency.
    Yang SJ; Gallo DA; Beilock SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1359-65. PubMed ID: 19686029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Bader R; Mecklinger A; Hoppstädter M; Meyer P
    Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(2):772-81. PubMed ID: 20045471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral, neuroimaging, and computational evidence for perceptual caching in repetition priming.
    Saggar M; Miikkulainen R; Schnyer DM
    Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 1315():75-91. PubMed ID: 20005215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primacy of functional knowledge in semantic representations: the case of living and nonliving things.
    Phelps FG; Macken WJ; Barry C; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1984-2009. PubMed ID: 16987785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are memories for duration modality specific?
    Ogden RS; Wearden JH; Jones LA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 19391045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of affective significance on different levels of processing using pupil dilation in an analogical reasoning task.
    Prehn K; Heekeren HR; van der Meer E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 21044649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating source memory decisions in the prefrontal cortex: fMRI of diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.
    Gallo DA; McDonough IM; Scimeca J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):955-69. PubMed ID: 19413478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):529-51. PubMed ID: 22905930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sensory nature of episodic memory: sensory priming effects due to memory trace activation.
    Brunel L; Labeye E; Lesourd M; Versace R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1081-8. PubMed ID: 19586271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.